Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419264›Full record

ArticleElectronic journal of statistics2013

Diffusion tensor smoothing through weighted Karcher means.

Owen Carmichael, Jun Chen, Debashis Paul, Jie Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electronic journal of statistics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diffusion tensor smoothing through weighted Karcher means.Electronic journal of statistics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Owen CarmichaelDepartment of Neurology and Computer Science University of California, Davis ocarmichel@ucdavis.edu.
Jun ChenDepartment of Statistics University of California, Davis.
Debashis PaulDepartment of Statistics University of California, Davis.
Jie PengDepartment of Statistics University of California, Davis.

Funding

UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
Brain pathologies, reserve and cognition in aging and dementiaR01AG031563 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Evan Fletcher, SARAH E TOMASZEWSKI-FARIAS · 2009 to 2026
$8.9M
Heterogeneity of Mild Cognitive Impairment(MCI)R01AG021028 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 2003 to 2014
$4.6M
ENGLISH AND SPANISH ASSESSMENT OF COGNITION IN ELDERLYR01AG010220 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MUNGAS, DAN M. · 1992 to 2012
$4.5M
Understanding the Pathway to Functional Disability in Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG031252 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TOMASZEWSKI-FARIAS, SARAH E · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
"MR Morphometrics and Cognitive Decline Rate in Large-Scale Aging Studies"K01AG030514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CARMICHAEL, OWEN T. · 2008 to 2012
$495k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS R01 AG010220NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021028NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031252NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantifies the spatial distribution of water Diffusion at each voxel on a regular grid of locations in a biological specimen by Diffusion tensors- 3 × 3 positive definite matrices. Removal of noise from DTI is an important problem due to the high scientific relevance of DTI and relatively low signal to noise ratio it provides. Leading approaches to this problem amount to estimation of weighted Karcher means of Diffusion tensors within spatial neighborhoods, under various metrics imposed on the space of tensors. However, it is unclear how the behavior of these estimators varies with the magnitude of DTI sensor noise (the noise resulting from the thermal e!ects of MRI scanning) as well as the geometric structure of the underlying Diffusion tensor neighborhoods. In this paper, we combine theoretical analysis, empirical analysis of simulated DTI data, and empirical analysis of real DTI scans to compare the noise removal performance of three kernel-based DTI smoothers that are based on Euclidean, log-Euclidean, and affine-invariant metrics. The results suggest, contrary to conventional wisdom, that imposing a simplistic Euclidean metric may in fact provide comparable or superior noise removal, especially in relatively unstructured regions and/or in the presence of moderate to high levels of sensor noise. On the contrary, log-Euclidean and affine-invariant metrics may lead to better noise removal in highly structured anatomical regions, especially when the sensor noise is of low magnitude. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the interplay of sensor noise magnitude and tensor field geometric structure when assessing Diffusion tensor smoothing options. They also point to the necessity for continued development of smoothing methods that perform well across a large range of scenarios.

Indexed as

Diffusion MRIKarcher meankernel smoothingperturbation analysis.Tensor space

Identifiers

PMID25419264
PMCPMC4239671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.