Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419196›Full record

ArticleJournal of mixed methods research2011

RO1 Funding for Mixed Methods Research: Lessons learned from the Mixed-Method Analysis of Japanese Depression Project.

Denise Saint Arnault, Michael D Fetters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mixed methods research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Testing the influence of cultural determinants on help-seeking theory.The American journal of orthopsychiatry · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Networks and the Maintenance of Conformity: Japanese sojourner women.International journal of culture and mental health · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Semantic Examination of a Japanese Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression: A Cautionary Analysis Using Mixed Methods.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denise Saint ArnaultMichigan State University College of Nursing B510-B West Fee Hall East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Michael D FettersUniversity of Michigan Department of Family Medicine 1018 Fuller St Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1213 Tel. 734-998-7120 X 341 Fax 734-998-7335 mfetters@umich.edu.

Funding

Mixed-Method Analysis of Depressed Japanese WomenR01MH071307 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAINT ARNAULT, DENISE M · 2005 to 2008
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed methods research has made significant in-roads in the effort to examine complex health related phenomenon. However, little has been published on the funding of mixed methods research projects. This paper addresses that gap by presenting an example of an NIMH funded project using a mixed methods QUAL-QUAN triangulation design entitled "The Mixed-Method Analysis of Japanese Depression." We present the Cultural Determinants of Health Seeking model that framed the study, the specific aims, the quantitative and qualitative data sources informing the study, and overview of the mixing of the two studies. Finally, we examine reviewer's comments and our insights related to writing mixed method proposal successful for achieving RO1 level funding.

Indexed as

funding trendshealth disparitiesJapanese culturemental healthmixed methods

Identifiers

PMID25419196
PMCPMC4240524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.