ArticleSIAM journal on applied dynamical systems2014
A modeling exploration of how synaptic feedback to descending projection neurons shapes the activity of an oscillatory network.
Article in SIAM journal on applied dynamical systems, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circuit feedback increases activity level of a circuit input through interactions with intrinsic properties.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- The role of electrical coupling in generating and modulating oscillations in a neuronal network.Mathematical biosciences · 2016Article
- Convergent neuromodulation onto a network neuron can have divergent effects at the network level.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2016Article
- Neuromodulation to the Rescue: Compensation of Temperature-Induced Breakdown of Rhythmic Motor Patterns via Extrinsic Neuromodulatory Input.PLoS biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rhythmic activity which underlies motor output is often initiated and controlled by descending modulatory projection pathways onto central pattern generator (CPG) networks. In turn, these descending pathways receive synaptic feedback from their target CPG network, which can influence the CPG output. However, the mechanisms underlying such bi-directional synaptic interactions are mostly unexplored. We develop a reduced mathematical model, including both feed-forward and feedback circuitry, to examine how the synaptic interactions involving two projection neurons, MCN1 and CPN2, can produce and shape the activity of the gastric mill CPG in the crab stomatogastric nervous system. We use simplifying assumptions that are based on the behavior of the biological system to reduce this model down to 2 dimensions, which allows for phase plane analysis of the model output. The model shows a distinct activity for the gastric mill rhythm that is elicited when MCN1 and CPN2 are co-active compared to the rhythm elicited by MCN1 activity alone. Furthermore, the presence of feedback to the projection neuron CPN2 provides a distinct locus of pattern generation in the model which does not require reciprocally inhibitory interactions between the gastric mill CPG neurons, but is instead based on a half-center oscillator that occurs through a tri-synaptic pathway that includes CPN2. Our modeling results show that feedback to projection pathways may provide additional mechanisms for the generation of motor activity. These mechanisms can have distinct dependence on network parameters and may therefore provide additional flexibility for the rhythmic motor output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.