Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419044›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescent research2014

"Dude, You're Such a Slut!" Barriers and Facilitators of Sexual Communication Among Young Gay Men and Their Best Friends.

Bryce McDavitt, Matt G Mutchler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescent research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03331978 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence Intervention for HIV+ African Americans), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03331978 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Antiretroviral Treatment Adherence Intervention for HIV+ African Americans

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2018 to 2021Enrolled306ConditionsHIV/AIDSArmsRise - Treatment Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bryce McDavittAIDS Project Los Angeles, CA, USA ; California State University, Dominguez Hills, CA, USA ; Pacifica Graduate Institute, CA, USA.
Matt G MutchlerAIDS Project Los Angeles, CA, USA ; California State University, Dominguez Hills, CA, USA.
California State University, Dominguez Hills · USPacifica Graduate Institute · US

Funding

YBMSM's Sexual Communication with Friends in Two Culturally Distinct U.S. RegionsR15MH095689 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV-DOMINGUEZ HILLS · PI MUTCHLER, MATT GARY · 2012 to 2012
$399k
Sex-drugs and HIV: How substances became associated with sex among African AmericR03DA026731 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV-DOMINGUEZ HILLS · PI MUTCHLER, MATT GARY · 2009 to 2010
$269k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA026731NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH095689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversations with friends are a crucial source of information about sexuality for young gay men, and a key way that sexual health norms are shared during emerging adulthood. However, friends can only provide this support if they are able to talk openly about sexuality. We explored this issue through qualitative interviews with an ethnically diverse sample of young gay men and their best friends. Using theories of sexual scripts, stigma, and emerging adulthood, we examined how conversations about sex could be obstructed or facilitated by several key factors, including judgmentalism, comfort/discomfort, and receptivity. Gay male friends sometimes spoke about unprotected sex in judgmental ways (e.g., calling a friend "slut" or "whore" for having sex without condoms). In some cases, this language could be used playfully, while in others it had the effect of shaming a friend and obstructing further communication about sexual risk. Female friends were rarely openly judgmental, but often felt uncomfortable talking about gay male sexuality, which could render this topic taboo. Sexual communication was facilitated most effectively when friends encouraged it through humor or supportive questioning. Drawing on these findings, we show how judgmentalism and discomfort may generate sexual scripts with contradictory norms, and potentially obstruct support from friends around sexual exploration during a period of life when it may be most developmentally important.

Indexed as

emerging adulthoodgenderlesbians/gays/bisexuals/transexualspeers/friendsrisk behaviorsexuality

Identifiers

PMID25419044
PMCPMC4239541
OpenAlexW2112381611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.