Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25419027›Full record

ArticleFamily relations2014

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Relationship Education in the U.S. Army: 2-Year Outcomes.

Scott M Stanley, Galena K Rhoades, Benjamin A Loew, Elizabeth S Allen, Sarah Carter, Laura J Osborne, Donnella Prentice, Howard J Markman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family relations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Protecting Strong African American Families Program: a Randomized Controlled Trial with Rural African American Couples.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Genetic and subjective sensitivity, relationship dynamics, and psychological distress in couples.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Something to talk about: Topics of conversation between romantic partners during military deployments.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Associations Between Participant Ratings of PREP for Strong Bonds and Marital Outcomes 1 Year Postintervention.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Can marriage education mitigate the risks associated with premarital cohabitation?Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott M StanleyUniversity of Denver.
Galena K RhoadesUniversity of Denver.
Benjamin A LoewUniversity of Denver.
Elizabeth S AllenUniversity of Colorado Denver.
Sarah Carter
Laura J OsborneUniversity of Denver.
Donnella PrenticeUniversity of Denver.
Howard J MarkmanUniversity of Denver.

Funding

Marriage Education and Risk Reduction for Army FamiliesR01HD048780 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI STANLEY, SCOTT M · 2006 to 2015
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of an evidence-based, community-delivered adaptation of couple relationship education (CRE; specifically, PREP, The Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program) delivered at two Army installations. The study is a randomized controlled trial with two years of follow-up, examining marital quality and stability. Sample composition was 662 married couples with a spouse in the U.S. Army. Analyses yielded no evidence of overall enduring intervention effects on relationship quality but couples assigned to intervention at the higher risk site were significantly less likely than controls to be divorced at the two-year follow-up (8.1% vs. 14.9%,

Indexed as

Army couplesDivorceMarriage educationRandomized Controlled TrialRelationship education

Identifiers

PMID25419027
PMCPMC4237282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.