Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418732›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2014

Aberrant α-adrenergic hypertrophic response in cardiomyocytes from human induced pluripotent cells.

Gabor Földes, Elena Matsa, János Kriston-Vizi, Thomas Leja, Stefan Amisten, Ljudmila Kolker, Thusharika Kodagoda, Nazanin F Dolatshad, Maxime Mioulane, Karine Vauchez and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sympathetic Neurons Regulate Cardiomyocyte Maturation in Culture.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Considerations for anFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabor FöldesNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK; Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest H1122, Hungary. Electronic address: g.foldes@imperial.ac.uk.
Elena MatsaWolfson Centre for Stem Cells, Tissue Engineering and Modelling, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
János Kriston-ViziBioinformatics Image Core, Medical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Thomas LejaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Stefan AmistenOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Oxford University, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK.
Ljudmila KolkerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK; National Institute for Biological Standards and Controls, Cell Biology and Imaging, Hertfordshire EN6 3QG, UK.
Thusharika KodagodaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Nazanin F DolatshadNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Maxime MioulaneNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Karine VauchezNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Tamás ArányiInstitute of Enzymology, RCNS, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest H1113, Hungary.
Robin KettelerBioinformatics Image Core, Medical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Michael D SchneiderNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Chris DenningWolfson Centre for Stem Cells, Tissue Engineering and Modelling, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Sian E HardingNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUMedical Research Council · GBSemmelweis University · HUUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E006159/1British Heart Foundation PG/09/027/27141British Heart Foundation RG/11/19/29264British Heart Foundation RG/14/1/30588Medical Research Council G0801098Medical Research Council G113/30Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0800785Medical Research Council MR/L012618/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G1000035/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/C013105/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000225/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells (hESC-CMs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-CMs) represent new models for drug discovery. Although hypertrophy is a high-priority target, we found that hiPSC-CMs were systematically unresponsive to hypertrophic signals such as the α-adrenoceptor (αAR) agonist phenylephrine (PE) compared to hESC-CMs. We investigated signaling at multiple levels to understand the underlying mechanism of this differential responsiveness. The expression of the normal α1AR gene, ADRA1A, was reversibly silenced during differentiation, accompanied by ADRA1B upregulation in either cell type. ADRA1B signaling was intact in hESC-CMs, but not in hiPSC-CMs. We observed an increased tonic activity of inhibitory kinase pathways in hiPSC-CMs, and inhibition of antihypertrophic kinases revealed hypertrophic increases. There is tonic suppression of cell growth in hiPSC-CMs, but not hESC-CMs, limiting their use in investigation of hypertrophic signaling. These data raise questions regarding the hiPSC-CM as a valid model for certain aspects of cardiac disease.

Indexed as

Adrenergic AgentsAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCell LineCell SizeEmbryonic Stem CellsGene ExpressionHumansHypertrophyImidazolesInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIsoproterenolMicroscopy, ConfocalMyocytes, CardiacPhenylephrineADRA1A protein, humanADRA1B protein, humanAdrenergic AgentsAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCGP 20712AImidazolesIsoproterenolPhenylephrineReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1

Identifiers

PMID25418732
PMCPMC4235744
OpenAlexW2002257986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.