Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418721›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2014

SPOT14-positive neural stem/progenitor cells in the hippocampus respond dynamically to neurogenic regulators.

Marlen Knobloch, Carolin von Schoultz, Luis Zurkirchen, Simon M G Braun, Mojca Vidmar, Sebastian Jessberger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of Lipid Metabolism for Neural Stem Cell Regulation.Brain plasticity (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein MBD1 Regulates Neuronal Lineage Commitment through Maintaining Adult Neural Stem Cell Identity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marlen KnoblochBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Carolin von SchoultzBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Luis ZurkirchenBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon M G BraunBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mojca VidmarBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Sebastian JessbergerBrain Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: jessberger@hifo.uzh.ch.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) in the adult brain is tightly controlled to prevent exhaustion and to ensure proper neurogenesis. Several extrinsic stimuli affect NSPC regulation. However, the lack of unique markers led to controversial results regarding the in vivo behavior of NSPCs to different stimuli. We recently identified SPOT14, which controls NSPC proliferation through regulation of de novo lipogenesis, selectively in low-proliferating NSPCs. Whether SPOT14-expressing (SPOT14+) NSPCs react in vivo to neurogenic regulators is not known. We show that aging is accompanied by a marked disappearance of SPOT14+ NSPCs, whereas running, a positive neurogenic stimulus, increases proliferation of SPOT14+ NSPCs. Furthermore, transient depletion of highly proliferative cells recruits SPOT14+ NSPCs into the proliferative pool. Additionally, we have established endogenous SPOT14 protein staining, reflecting transgenic SPOT14-GFP expression. Thus, our data identify SPOT14 as a potent marker for adult NSPCs that react dynamically to positive and negative neurogenic regulators.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkersCell ProliferationDacarbazineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHippocampusImmunohistochemistryMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNuclear ProteinsTemozolomideTranscription FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkersDacarbazineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNuclear ProteinsTemozolomideThrsp protein, mouseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25418721
PMCPMC4235138
OpenAlexW2076994244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.