Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418177›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Origins of Escherichia coli growth rate and cell shape changes at high external osmolality.

Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W Shaevitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Recombinant Peptide Production SoftensInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robust surface-to-mass coupling and turgor-dependent cell width determine bacterial dry-mass density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. L form bacteria growth in low-osmolality medium.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Osmotaxis inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Dynamics of Escherichia coli's passive response to a sudden decrease in external osmolarity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Constraints, Trade-offs and the Currency of Fitness.Journal of molecular evolution · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Teuta PilizotaLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; School of Biology and Centre for Synthetic and Systems Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: teuta.pilizota@ed.ac.uk.
Joshua W ShaevitzLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey; Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Princeton University · US

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM071508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Escherichia coli, a sudden increase in external concentration causes a pressure drop across the cell envelope, followed by an active recovery. After recovery, and if the external osmolality remains high, cells have been shown to grow more slowly, smaller, and at reduced turgor pressure. Despite the fact that the active recovery is a key stress response, the nature of these changes and how they relate to each other is not understood. Here, we use fluorescence imaging of single cells during hyperosmotic shocks, combined with custom made microfluidic devices, to show that cells fully recover their volume to the initial, preshock value and continue to grow at a slower rate immediately after the recovery. We show that the cell envelope material properties do not change after hyperosmotic shock, and that cell shape recovers along with cell volume. Taken together, these observations indicate that the turgor pressure recovers to its initial value so that reduced turgor is not responsible for the reduced growth rate observed immediately after recovery. To determine the point at which the reduction in cell size and turgor pressure occurs after shock, we measured the volume of E. coli cells at different stages of growth in bulk cultures. We show that cell volume reaches the same maximal level irrespective of the osmolality of the media. Based on these measurements, we propose that turgor pressure is used as a feedback variable for osmoregulatory pumps instead of being directly responsible for the reduction in growth rates. Reestablishment of turgor to its initial value might ensure correct attachment of the inner membrane and cell wall needed for cell wall biosynthesis.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationOsmoregulationOsmotic PressureEscherichia coliFeedback, PhysiologicalOsmolar Concentration

Identifiers

PMID25418177
PMCPMC4213672
OpenAlexW1993559375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.