Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418099›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Changing chromatin fiber conformation by nucleosome repositioning.

Oliver Müller, Nick Kepper, Robert Schöpflin, Ramona Ettig, Karsten Rippe, Gero Wedemann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Physical models reveal indirect reader protein interactions that facilitate epigenetic crosstalk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Beyond the mono-nucleosome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome modeling: From chromatin fibers to genes.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nucleosome positions alone can be used to predict domains in yeast chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The chromatin fiber: multiscale problems and approaches.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver MüllerInstitute for Applied Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.
Nick KepperDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and BioQuant, Heidelberg, Germany.
Robert SchöpflinInstitute for Applied Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.
Ramona EttigDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and BioQuant, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karsten RippeDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and BioQuant, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gero WedemannInstitute for Applied Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany. Electronic address: gero.wedemann@fh-stralsund.de.
University of Applied Sciences Stralsund · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEDKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin conformation is dynamic and heterogeneous with respect to nucleosome positions, which can be changed by chromatin remodeling complexes in the cell. These molecular machines hydrolyze ATP to translocate or evict nucleosomes, and establish loci with regularly and more irregularly spaced nucleosomes as well as nucleosome-depleted regions. The impact of nucleosome repositioning on the three-dimensional chromatin structure is only poorly understood. Here, we address this issue by using a coarse-grained computer model of arrays of 101 nucleosomes considering several chromatin fiber models with and without linker histones, respectively. We investigated the folding of the chain in dependence of the position of the central nucleosome by changing the length of the adjacent linker DNA in basepair steps. We found in our simulations that these translocations had a strong effect on the shape and properties of chromatin fibers: i), Fiber curvature and flexibility at the center were largely increased and long-range contacts between distant nucleosomes on the chain were promoted. ii), The highest destabilization of the fiber conformation occurred for a nucleosome shifted by two basepairs from regular spacing, whereas effects of linker DNA changes of ?10 bp in phase with the helical twist of DNA were minimal. iii), A fiber conformation can stabilize a regular spacing of nucleosomes inasmuch as favorable stacking interactions between nucleosomes are facilitated. This can oppose nucleosome translocations and increase the energetic costs for chromatin remodeling. Our computational modeling framework makes it possible to describe the conformational heterogeneity of chromatin in terms of nucleosome positions, and thus advances theoretical models toward a better understanding of how genome compaction and access are regulated within the cell.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyComputer SimulationDNAHistonesModels, GeneticModels, MolecularMonte Carlo MethodNucleic Acid ConformationNucleosomesPliabilityChromatinDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID25418099
PMCPMC4223204
OpenAlexW1987182457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.