Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418061›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2014

Engineering the control of mosquito-borne infectious diseases.

Paolo Gabrieli, Andrea Smidler, Flaminia Catteruccia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Globe-TrottingVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  10. Gene drives as a response to infection and resistance.Infection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Establishment of a method forWellcome open research · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo Gabrieli
Andrea Smidler
Flaminia Catteruccia
Harvard University · USUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

The Graduate Program in Tropical Infectious Diseases (GPiTID)T32AI049928 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Flaminia Catteruccia, Phyllis J. Kanki · 2001 to 2026
$5.0M
Targeting the reproductive interactome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiaeR01AI104956 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CATTERUCCIA, FLAMINIA · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
European Research Council 260897NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI104956-01A1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104956NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI049928Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in genetic engineering are bringing new promise for controlling mosquito populations that transmit deadly pathogens. Here we discuss past and current efforts to engineer mosquito strains that are refractory to disease transmission or are suitable for suppressing wild disease-transmitting populations.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringAnimalsCommunicable DiseasesCulicidaeHumansMosquito Control

Identifiers

PMID25418061
PMCPMC4282146
OpenAlexW2170721277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.