Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25418036›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2015

Quantifying silicone oil emulsification in patients: are we only seeing the tip of the iceberg?

Yau Kei Chan, Ning Cheung, Wing Suet Catherine Chan, David Wong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Combining Perfluorobutylpentane (FTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. What Is the Cause of Toxicity of Silicone Oil?Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Yau Kei ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Level 3, Block B, Cyberport 4, 100 Cyberport Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Ning CheungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Level 3, Block B, Cyberport 4, 100 Cyberport Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Wing Suet Catherine ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Level 3, Block B, Cyberport 4, 100 Cyberport Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
David WongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Room 301, Level 3, Block B, Cyberport 4, 100 Cyberport Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. shdwong@hku.hk.
Cyberport · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmulsification of silicone oil in the eye is a difficult problem. In an effort to find an objective way to quantify emulsification, we used the Coulter principle to measure silicone oil emulsified droplets from the washings of a series of patients.

methodsAqueous washouts after silicone oil removal were obtained from nine patients (nine eyes). We used the Coulter counter Multisizer® 4 to obtain the size distribution of the oil droplets.

resultsOver 65 % of the emulsified silicone oil droplets in the clinical samples had a diameter smaller than is detectable by light microscopy (2 μm). The median size of the droplets was between 1.1 and 1.9 μm. Based on the Spearman's correlation coefficient (r), there was a strong correlation between the number of the droplets that cannot be seen (between 1 and 2 μm) and those that can be seen (7-30 μm) (r = 0.817, p = 0.007).

conclusionOnce emulsification was detected clinically in the anterior chamber, extensive emulsification would have already occurred in the posterior chamber, with most of the emulsified droplets that were too small in size to be seen on clinical examination. Ostwald ripening might explain why there were so many small droplets. The predominance of small droplets might account for some of the clinical complications associated with silicone oil use.

Indexed as

EndotamponadeMicrospheresParticle SizeAdultAgedDrainageEmulsionsFemaleHumansMaleMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMiddle AgedSilicone OilsVitrectomyVitreoretinal SurgeryEmulsionsSilicone OilsCoulter counterEmulsificationSilicone oilTamponade

Identifiers

PMID25418036
OpenAlexW2056603972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.