Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25417130›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2015

Preliminary clinical experience with a dedicated interventional robotic system for CT-guided biopsies of lung lesions: a comparison with the conventional manual technique.

Michele Anzidei, Renato Argirò, Andrea Porfiri, Fabrizio Boni, Marco Anile, Fulvio Zaccagna, Domenico Vitolo, Luca Saba, Alessandro Napoli, Andrea Leonardi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07277088 (A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Percutaneous Interventional Surgery Control System for Pulmonary Nodule Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07277088 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Percutaneous Interventional Surgery Control System for Pulmonary Nodule Biopsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiayuan SunRan2025 to 2027Enrolled158ConditionsPulmonary Nodules, Lung Cancer (Diagnosis), Percutaneous Needle Biopsy, Transthoracic Needle BiopsyArmsPercutaneous Needle Biopsy with Interventional Surgical Control System, Conventional Manual Percutaneous Needle Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele AnzideiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences - Radiology - Sapienza, University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy, michele.anzidei@gmail.com.
Renato Argirò
Andrea Porfiri
Fabrizio Boni
Marco Anile
Fulvio Zaccagna
Domenico Vitolo
Luca Saba
Alessandro Napoli
Andrea Leonardi
Flavia Longo
Federico Venuta
Mario Bezzi
Carlo Catalano
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the performance of a robotic system for CT-guided lung biopsy in comparison to the conventional manual technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred patients referred for CT-guided lung biopsy were randomly assigned to group A (robot-assisted procedure) or group B (conventional procedure). Size, distance from entry point and position in lung of target lesions were evaluated to assess homogeneity differences between the two groups. Procedure duration, dose length product (DLP), precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were evaluated to assess the clinical performance of the robotic system as compared to the conventional technique.

resultsAll biopsies were successfully performed. The size (p = 0.41), distance from entry point (p = 0.86) and position in lung (p = 0.32) of target lesions were similar in both groups (p = 0.05). Procedure duration and radiation dose were significantly reduced in group A as compared to group B (p = 0.001). Precision of needle positioning, diagnostic performance of the biopsy and rate of complications were similar in both groups (p = 0.05).

conclusionRobot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy can be performed safely and with high diagnostic accuracy, reducing procedure duration and radiation dose in comparison to the conventional manual technique. KEY POINTS: • CT-guided biopsy is the main procedure to obtain diagnosis in lung tumours. • The robotic device facilitates percutaneous needle placement under CT guidance. • Robot-assisted CT-guided lung biopsy reduces procedure duration and radiation dose.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiography, InterventionalRoboticsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25417130
OpenAlexW2054099439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.