Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25417125›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Mucinous cystic neoplasms and serous cystadenomas arising in the body-tail of the pancreas: MR imaging characterization.

Riccardo Manfredi, Anna Ventriglia, William Mantovani, Sara Mehrabi, Enrico Boninsegna, Giuseppe Zamboni, Roberto Salvia, Roberto Pozzi Mucelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Serous pancreatic neoplasia, data and review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Pancreatic surgery for tumors in children and adolescents.Pediatric surgery international · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas.The Indian journal of surgery · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo ManfrediDepartment of Radiology, University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy, riccardo.manfredi@univr.it.
Anna Ventriglia
William Mantovani
Sara Mehrabi
Enrico Boninsegna
Giuseppe Zamboni
Roberto Salvia
Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
University of Verona · ITProvincia Autonoma di Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify magnetic resonance (MR)/MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging signs helpful in the differential diagnosis between serous cystadenomas (SCAs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), arising from the body/tail of the pancreas. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study had institutional review board approval and informed consent was waived. Fifty-three patients with non-communicating cystic pancreatic neoplasm of the body/tail, undergoing MR/MRCP, were included. Qualitative image analysis assessed the macroscopic pattern, number of cysts, presence of central scar, contrast enhancement of peripheral wall, and mural nodules. Quantitative analysis assessed the maximum diameter of the neoplasm, thickness of the peripheral wall, and calibre of the upstream main pancreatic duct.

resultsHistopathology results revealed that 27/53 (51 %) were SCAs, 26/53 (49 %) were MCNs. Microcystic pattern was observed in 88.2 % of SCAs and 11.8 % of MCNs; macrocystic pattern was observed in 90.5 % of MCNs and 9.5 % of SCAs (p < 0.0001). Central scar was detected in 29.6 % of SCAs and no MCNs (p = 0.003). Contrast enhancement of the peripheral wall was evident in 99.5 % of MCNs and 11.5 % of SCAs (p < 0.0001); mural nodules were depicted in 94.1 % of MCNs and 5.9 % of SCAs (p < 0.0001). Median maximum diameter was 54 mm for MCNs, 32 mm for SCAs (p = 0.001); median wall thickness was 4 mm for MCNs, 2 mm for SCAs (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsMacrocystic pattern, enhancement of a peripheral wall and mural nodules are suggestive of MCNs; whereas microcystic pattern, lack of peripheral wall and central scar are suggestive of SCAs. KEY POINTS: • MCNs have macrocystic patterns, contrast enhancement of the peripheral wall and mural nodules • Microcystic pattern and central scar are suggestive of SCA • Mural nodules detected in MCNs correlate with epithelial dysplasia • Chronic obstructive pancreatitis is equally depicted in patients with MCNs and SCAs.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceAdolescentAdultAgedCarcinoma in SituContrast MediaCystadenoma, MucinousCystadenoma, SerousDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID25417125
OpenAlexW2079687018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.