Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25417120›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

A multicentre phase III randomised controlled single-masked clinical trial evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of light-masks at preventing dark-adaptation in the treatment of early diabetic macular oedema (CLEOPATRA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sobha Sivaprasad, Geoffrey Arden, A Toby Prevost, Roxanne Crosby-Nwaobi, Helen Holmes, Joanna Kelly, Caroline Murphy, Gary Rubin, Joanna Vasconcelos, Philip Hykin

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Detecting Diabetic Retinal Neuropathy Using Fundus Perimetry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  3. Effect of light and diurnal variation on macular thickness in X-linked retinoschisis: a case series.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The neural retina in retinopathy of prematurity.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, 162, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, England. senswathi@aol.com.
Geoffrey Arden
A Toby Prevost
Roxanne Crosby-Nwaobi
Helen Holmes
Joanna Kelly
Caroline Murphy
Gary Rubin
Joanna Vasconcelos
Philip Hykin
King's College London · GBNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre · GBCity, University of London · GBInstitute of Ophthalmology · MX

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study will evaluate hypoxia, as a novel concept in the pathogenesis of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). As the oxygen demand of the eye is maximum during dark-adaptation, we hypothesize that wearing light-masks during sleep will cause regression and prevent the development and progression of DMO. The study protocol comprises both an efficacy and mechanistic evaluation to test this hypothesis. METHOD/

designThis is a phase III randomised controlled single-masked multicentre clinical trial to test the clinical efficacy of light-masks at preventing dark-adaptation in the treatment of non-central DMO. Three hundred patients with non-centre-involving DMO in at least one eye will be randomised 1:1 to light-masks and control masks (with no light) to be used during sleep at night for a period of 24 months. The primary outcome is regression of non-central oedema by assessing change in the zone of maximal retinal thickness at baseline on optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes will evaluate the prevention of development and progression of DMO by assessing changes in retinal thickness in different regions of the macula, macular volume, refracted visual acuity and level of retinopathy. Safety parameters will include sleep disturbance. Adverse events and measures of compliance will be assessed over 24 months. Participants recruited to the mechanistic sub-study will have additional retinal oximetry, multifocal electroretinography (ERG) and microperimetry to evaluate the role of hypoxia by assessing and comparing changes induced by supplemental oxygen and the light-masks at 12 months. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study will provide insight into the pathogenesis of DMO and provide evidence on whether a simple, non-invasive device in the form of a light-mask can help prevent the progression to centre-involving DMO and visual impairment in people with diabetes.

Indexed as

Dark AdaptationMasksResearch DesignClinical ProtocolsDiabetic RetinopathyElectroretinographyEnglandEquipment DesignHumansMacular EdemaOximetryOxygen ConsumptionPhototherapyPredictive Value of TestsSingle-Blind MethodTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25417120
PMCPMC4255925
OpenAlexW2121279421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.