Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25416919›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

How calorie-focused thinking about obesity and related diseases may mislead and harm public health. An alternative.

Sean C Lucan, James J DiNicolantonio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Comorbid Obesity in Chinese Patients with Bipolar Disorder.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Comparisons of Four Diet Quality Indexes to Define Single Meal Healthfulness.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2022
    Observational
  10. Phenomics, genomics of oil palm (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Diabetes, Therapeutic Inertia, and Patients' Medication Experience.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  13. The calorie counter-intuitive effect of restaurant menu calorie labelling.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean C Lucan1Department of Family and Social Medicine,Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center,1300 Morris Park Avenue,Block Building,Room 410,Bronx,NY 10461,USA.
James J DiNicolantonio2Department of Preventive Cardiology,Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital,Kansas City,MO,USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USSaint Luke's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevailing thinking about obesity and related diseases holds that quantifying calories should be a principal concern and target for intervention. Part of this thinking is that consumed calories - regardless of their sources - are equivalent; i.e. 'a calorie is a calorie'. The present commentary discusses various problems with the idea that 'a calorie is a calorie' and with a primarily quantitative focus on food calories. Instead, the authors argue for a greater qualitative focus on the sources of calories consumed (i.e. a greater focus on types of foods) and on the metabolic changes that result from consuming foods of different types. In particular, the authors consider how calorie-focused thinking is inherently biased against high-fat foods, many of which may be protective against obesity and related diseases, and supportive of starchy and sugary replacements, which are likely detrimental. Shifting the focus to qualitative food distinctions, a central argument of the paper is that obesity and related diseases are problems due largely to food-induced physiology (e.g. neurohormonal pathways) not addressable through arithmetic dieting (i.e. calorie counting). The paper considers potential harms of public health initiatives framed around calorie balance sheets - targeting 'calories in' and/or 'calories out' - that reinforce messages of overeating and inactivity as underlying causes, rather than intermediate effects, of obesity. Finally, the paper concludes that public health should work primarily to support the consumption of whole foods that help protect against obesity-promoting energy imbalance and metabolic dysfunction and not continue to promote calorie-directed messages that may create and blame victims and possibly exacerbate epidemics of obesity and related diseases.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFoodHumansNutritive ValueObesityPublic HealthChronic disease

Identifiers

PMID25416919
PMCPMC10271128
OpenAlexW2134204558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.