Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25416775›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

MS2 virus inactivation by atmospheric-pressure cold plasma using different gas carriers and power levels.

Yan Wu, Yongdong Liang, Kai Wei, Wei Li, Maosheng Yao, Jue Zhang, Sergey A Grinshpun

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role and Mechanism of Cold Plasma in InactivatingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Inactivation of airborne SARS-Co-V2 using NTP-UVGI hybrid process.International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST · 2023
    Article
  15. Cold atmospheric plasma for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.Plasma processes and polymers (Print) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan WuState Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yongdong LiangCollege of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Kai WeiState Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wei LiCollege of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Maosheng YaoState Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China yao@pku.edu.cn zhangjue@pku.edu.cn.
Jue ZhangCollege of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China yao@pku.edu.cn zhangjue@pku.edu.cn.
Sergey A GrinshpunCenter for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Peking University · CNState Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control · CNUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, airborne MS2 bacteriophages were exposed for subsecond time intervals to atmospheric-pressure cold plasma (APCP) produced using different power levels (20, 24, and 28 W) and gas carriers (ambient air, Ar-O2 [2%, vol/vol], and He-O2 [2%, vol/vol]). In addition, waterborne MS2 viruses were directly subjected to the APCP treatment for up to 3 min. MS2 viruses with and without the APCP exposure were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Viral inactivation was shown to exhibit linear relationships with the APCP generation power and exposure time (R(2) > 0.95 for all energy levels tested) up to 95% inactivation (1.3-log reduction) after a subsecond airborne exposure at 28 W; about the same inactivation level was achieved for waterborne viruses with an exposure time of less than 1 min. A larger amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as atomic oxygen, in APCP was detected for a higher generation power with Ar-O2 and He-O2 gas carriers. SEM images, SDS-PAGE, and agarose gel analysis of exposed waterborne viruses showed various levels of damage to both surface proteins and their related RNA genes after the APCP exposure, thus leading to the loss of their viability and infectivity.

Indexed as

Atmospheric PressureMicrobial ViabilityPlasma GasesVirus InactivationBacteriophagesDisinfectionElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralTime FactorsViral ProteinsPlasma GasesRNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25416775
PMCPMC4292470
OpenAlexW2065707712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.