ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015
Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.Spinal cord · 2018Pooled it
- Transspinal stimulation preceding step training reorganizes spinal locomotor circuits in human spinal cord injury: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Trial
- Spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) in hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP): A sham-controlled crossover study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2021Trial
- Increase in Ia Afferent Synaptic Excitation of SOD1 G93A Mouse Motoneurons by 2-Week Anodal Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Ameliorate the Cellular Burden of the Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Multi-path direct current spinal stimulation extended survival in the SOD1-G93A model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The therapeutic effects of physical treatment for patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Trans-Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Targets CaFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Is there hope that transpinal direct current stimulation corrects motoneuron excitability and provides neuroprotection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?Physiological reports · 2021Review
- Branching points of primary afferent fibers are vital for the modulation of fiber excitability by epidural DC polarization and by GABA in the rat spinal cord.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Repeated anodal trans-spinal direct current stimulation results in long-term reduction of spasticity in mice with spinal cord injury.The Journal of physiology · 2019Article
- Afterdischarges of Spinal Interneurons Following a Brief High-Frequency Stimulation of Ia Afferents in the Cat.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019Article
- Transspinal Direct Current Stimulation Produces Persistent Plasticity in Human Motor Pathways.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Motor cortex and spinal cord neuromodulation promote corticospinal tract axonal outgrowth and motor recovery after cervical contusion spinal cord injury.Experimental neurology · 2017Article
- Long-lasting increase in axonal excitability after epidurally applied DC.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Does trans-spinal and local DC polarization affect presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression?The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Spinal cord direct current stimulation differentially modulates neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral spinal cord.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- The effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on motor pathways supplying the upper limb in humans.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsTrans-spinal DC stimulation affects both postsynaptic neurons and the presynaptic axons providing input to these neurons. In the present study, we show that intraspinally applied cathodal current replicates the effects of trans-spinal direct current stimulation in deeply anaesthetized animals and affects spinal neurons both during the actual current application and during a post-polarization period. Presynaptic effects of local cathodal polarization were expressed in an increase in the excitability of skin afferents (in the dorsal horn) and group Ia afferents (in motor nuclei), both during and at least 30 min after DC application. However, although the postsynaptic facilitation (i.e. more effective) activation of motoneurons by stimuli applied in a motor nucleus was very potent during local DC application, it was only negligible once DC was discontinued. The results suggest that the prolonged effects of cathodal polarization are primarily associated with changes in synaptic transmission. ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to compare presynaptic and postsynaptic actions of direct current polarization in the spinal cord, focusing on DC effects on primary afferents and motoneurons. To reduce the directly affected spinal cord region, a weak polarizing direct current (0.1-0.3 μA) was applied locally in deeply anaesthetized cats and rats; within the hindlimb motor nuclei in the caudal lumbar segments, or in the dorsal horn within the terminal projection area of low threshold skin afferents. Changes in the excitability of primary afferents activated by intraspinal stimuli (20-50 μA) were estimated using increases or decreases in compound action potentials recorded from the dorsal roots or peripheral nerves as their measure. Changes in the postsynaptic actions of the afferents were assessed from intracellularly recorded monosynaptic EPSPs in hindlimb motoneurons and monosynaptic extracellular field potentials (evoked by group Ia afferents in motor nuclei, or by low threshold cutaneous afferents in the dorsal horn). The excitability of motoneurons activated by intraspinal stimuli was assessed using intracellular records or motoneuronal discharges recorded from a ventral root or a muscle nerve. Cathodal polarization was found to affect motoneurons and afferents providing input to them to a different extent. The excitability of both was markedly increased during DC application, although post-polarization facilitation was found to involve presynaptic afferents and some of their postsynaptic actions, but only negligibly motoneurons themselves. Taken together, these results indicate that long-lasting post-polarization facilitation of spinal activity induced by locally applied cathodal current primarily reflects the facilitation of synaptic transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.