Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25416493›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2014

Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation in prehospital treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Skule A Bakke, Morten T Botker, Ingunn S Riddervold, Hans Kirkegaard, Erika F Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effect of noninvasive ventilation on intubation risk in prehospital patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a retrospective study.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Article
  9. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2019
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Skule A BakkeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Southern Jutland, Denmark. skulebakke@hotmail.com.
Morten T BotkerPrehospital Research Department, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. botker@fastmail.fm.
Ingunn S RiddervoldPrehospital Research Department, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Ingunn.Riddervold@ph.rm.dk.
Hans KirkegaardResearch Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. hanskirk@rm.dk.
Erika F ChristensenPrehospital Research Department, Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Erika.Christensen@ph.rm.dk.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKSygehus Sønderjylland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are frequently used inhospital for treating respiratory failure, especially in treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Early initiation of treatment is important for success and introduction already in the prehospital setting may be beneficial. Our goal was to assess the evidence for an effect of prehospital CPAP or NIV as a supplement to standard medical treatment alone on the following outcome measures; mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and intubation rate. We undertook a systematic review based on a search in the three databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. We included 12 studies in our review, but only four of these were of acceptable size and quality to conclude on our endpoints of interest. All four studies examine prehospital CPAP. Of these, only one small, randomized controlled trial shows a reduced mortality rate and a reduced intubation rate with supplemental CPAP. The other three studies have neutral findings, but in two of these a trend toward lower intubation rate is found. The effect of supplemental NIV has only been evaluated in smaller studies with insufficient power to conclude on our endpoints. None of these studies have shown an effect on neither mortality nor intubation rate, but two small, randomized controlled trials show a reduction in intensive care unit length of stay and a trend toward lower intubation rate. The risk of both type two errors and publication bias is evident, and the findings are not consistent enough to make solid conclusion on supplemental prehospital NIV. Large, randomized controlled trials regarding the effect of NIV and CPAP as supplement to standard medical treatment alone, in the prehospital setting, are needed.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAcute DiseaseContinuous Positive Airway PressureControlled Clinical Trials as TopicEmergency Medical ServicesHumansNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID25416493
PMCPMC4251922
OpenAlexW2028848531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.