Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25416460›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2015

Animal models of chronic migraine.

Robin James Storer, Weera Supronsinchai, Anan Srikiatkhachorn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Animal Models of Chronic Migraine: From the Bench to Therapy.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chronic Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: A Review of Current Perspectives.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Animal Models of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Physiopathology of cephalic pain: where are we?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robin James StorerDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand, james.s@chula.ac.th.
Weera Supronsinchai
Anan Srikiatkhachorn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animal models of migraine have been described. Some of them have been useful in the development of new therapies. All of them have their shortcomings. Animal models of chronic migraine have been relatively less frequently described. Whether a rigid distinction between episodic and chronic migraine is useful when their underlying pathophysiology is likely to be the same and that migraine frequency probably depends on complex polygenic influences remains to be determined. Any model of chronic migraine must reflect the chronicity of the disorder and be reliable and validated with pharmacological interventions. Future animal models of chronic migraine are likely to involve recurrent activation of the trigeminal nociceptive system. Valid models would provide a means for investigating pathophysiological mechanism of the transformation from episodic to chronic migraine and may also be used to test the efficacy of potential preventive medications.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedChronic DiseaseDisease ProgressionDrug DiscoveryMiceMigraine DisordersPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsTrigeminal NerveTrigeminal Nuclei

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.