ReviewDrug safety2015
The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.
Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) with and without Inverse Agonism: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Pooled it
- Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers impact on the gut microbiome: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Two-Drug Combinations Therapy of Different Doses of Valsartan Existing Diverse Significance for Hypertensive Patients.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- The benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers combined with calcium channel blockers on metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2018Pooled it
- Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Erectile Dysfunction in Hypertensive Men: A Brief Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.American journal of men's healthPooled it
- Low-Dose TEL/AML/CHTD SPC Versus Standard-Dose TEL in Hypertension: Phase III RCT.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- A Comparison Study of Olmesartan and Valsartan Effects on Myocardial Metabolism in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: the OVOID Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Bioequivalence and Food Effect Assessment of Two Fixed-Dose Combination Formulations of Telmisartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Combination of the chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) antagonist DMX-200 and candesartan for COVID-19: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2024Trial
- Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the effects of Angiotensin II receptor blocker on renal function among African Americans: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Trial
- Effect of Fimasartan versus Valsartan and Olmesartan on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Korean Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Three-Parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study (Fimasartan Achieving Systolic Blood Pressure Target (FAST) Study).Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Trial
- 24-Hour blood pressure response to lower dose (30 mg) fimasartan in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2017Trial
- Evaluation of the angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil in African-American patients with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Trial
- Article
- A Computational Journey Toward an Optimal Design for Metamaterial Epicardial Passive Sleeves.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Emerging epigenetic modifications in renal fibrosis: From mechanisms to treatments.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Effects of Inhibitors of the Activity of the Circulating Renin-Angiotensin System on the Growth and Proliferation of Endometrial Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Variability in Response to Valsartan and Its Relationship WithHealth science reports · 2025Article
- Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for the Management of Hypertension: Advancements and Challenges.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
All national guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as an initial or add-on antihypertensive therapy. The eight available ARBs have variable clinical efficacy when used for control of hypertension. Additive blood pressure-lowering effects have been demonstrated when ARBs are combined with thiazide diuretics or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, augmenting hypertension control. Furthermore, therapeutic use of ARBs goes beyond their antihypertensive effects, with evidence-based benefits in heart failure and diabetic renal disease particularly among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-intolerant patients. On the other hand, combining renin-angiotensin system blocking agents, a formerly common practice among medical subspecialists focusing on the management of hypertension, has ceased, as there is not only no evidence of cardiovascular benefit but also modest evidence of harm, particularly with regard to renal dysfunction. ARBs are very well tolerated as monotherapy, as well as in combination with other antihypertensive medications, which improve adherence to therapy and have become a mainstay in the treatment of stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.