ArticleInternational orthopaedics2015
Outcome of isolated polyethylene tibial insert exchange after primary cemented total knee arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Defining "Paradoxical Instability" and Other Indications for Aseptic Single-Component Polyethylene Revision: A Cohort Study Including Mid-flexion Instability and Limited Arc of Motion.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- A Comparison of Isolated Tibial Insert Exchanges for Global Instability to Full Revisions for Flexion Instability in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- The Role of Constraint in Revision Total Knee Replacement for Instability: Full Component Revision Vs Isolated Polyethylene Exchange in Selected Patients.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- When Polyethylene Exchange Is Appropriate for Prosthetic Knee Instability.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTotal knee arthroplasty using a modular design gives the possibility for an isolated exchange of the tibial polyethylene insert in patients with failed total knee arthroplasty. The success of this kind of surgery is still controversial. We analysed the clinical outcome after isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange.
methodsIn this retrospective study we included 62 consecutive patients with an isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange at our institution. The average follow-up was 35 months. For clinical evaluation we used the Oxford Knee score, the Knee Society score, the Turba score, and the Kujala score. The health-related quality of life was determined with the SF-36 score and the visual analogue pain scale.
resultsThe operations were performed 73 months after primary total knee arthroplasty on average. The main reasons for isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange were instability and wear. In the clinical outcome patients achieved 31.5 points in the Oxford Knee score, 120.5 points in the Knee Society score, 9.3 points in the Turba score, and 49.0 points in the Kujala score. Mean level of persisting pain was 2.2. In the SF-36 score patients achieved 36.3 points physical and 51.7 points mental. The overall survival for isolated tibial insert exchange revealed 72.2 % survival at 6.25 years follow-up with a repeat revision rate of 11 %.
conclusionsIsolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange revealed a good clinical outcome. There is a tendency for better results in comparison with the information given in literature for most of the parameters including a lower rate in repeat revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.