Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25416100›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Oxidative stress in susceptibility to breast cancer: study in Spanish population.

Patricia Rodrigues, Griselda de Marco, Jessica Furriol, Maria Luisa Mansego, Mónica Pineda-Alonso, Anna Gonzalez-Neira, Juan Carlos Martin-Escudero, Javier Benitez, Ana Lluch, Felipe J Chaves and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of an AmpliSeqFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  14. Extracellular superoxide dismutase and its role in cancer.Free radical biology & medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Rodrigues
Griselda de Marco
Jessica Furriol
Maria Luisa Mansego
Mónica Pineda-Alonso
Anna Gonzalez-Neira
Juan Carlos Martin-Escudero
Javier Benitez
Ana Lluch
Felipe J Chaves
Pilar ErolesINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain. pilar.eroles@uv.es.
INCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESSpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlterations in the redox balance are involved in the origin, promotion and progression of cancer. Inter-individual differences in the oxidative stress regulation can explain a part of the variability in cancer susceptibility.The aim of this study was to evaluate if polymorphisms in genes codifying for the different systems involved in oxidative stress levels can have a role in susceptibility to breast cancer.

methodsWe have analyzed 76 single base polymorphisms located in 27 genes involved in oxidative stress regulation by SNPlex technology. First, we have tested all the selected SNPs in 493 breast cancer patients and 683 controls and we have replicated the significant results in a second independent set of samples (430 patients and 803 controls). Gene-gene interactions were performed by the multifactor dimensionality reduction approach.

resultsSix polymorphisms rs1052133 (OGG1), rs406113 and rs974334 (GPX6), rs2284659 (SOD3), rs4135225 (TXN) and rs207454 (XDH) were significant in the global analysis. The gene-gene interactions demonstrated a significant four-variant interaction among rs406113 (GPX6), rs974334 (GPX6), rs105213 (OGG1) and rs2284659 (SOD3) (p-value = 0.0008) with high-risk genotype combination showing increased risk for breast cancer (OR = 1.75 [95% CI; 1.26-2.44]).

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that different genotypes in genes of the oxidant/antioxidant pathway could affect the susceptibility to breast cancer. Furthermore, our study highlighted the importance of the analysis of the epistatic interactions to define with more accuracy the influence of genetic variants in susceptibility to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityOxidative StressWhite PeopleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChromosome MappingDatabases, GeneticEpistasis, GeneticFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotype

Identifiers

PMID25416100
PMCPMC4251690
OpenAlexW2057379607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.