Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25415567›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2015

Comparing in vivo pump-probe and multiphoton fluorescence microscopy of melanoma and pigmented lesions.

Jesse W Wilson, Simone Degan, Christina S Gainey, Tanya Mitropoulos, Mary Jane Simpson, Jennifer Y Zhang, Warren S Warren

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Invited Review Article: Pump-probe microscopy.The Review of scientific instruments · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jesse W WilsonDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United States.
Simone DeganDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United StatesbDuke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States.
Christina S GaineyDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United States.
Tanya MitropoulosDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United States.
Mary Jane SimpsonDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United States.
Jennifer Y ZhangDuke University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, DUMC 3135, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States.
Warren S WarrenDuke University, Department of Chemistry, Box 90354, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0354, United StatesbDuke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United StatesdDuke University, Department of Biomedical.

Funding

Improving Melanoma Diagnosis with Pump-Probe Optical ImagingR01CA166555 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WARREN S · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Tissue Procurement and Analysis CoreP30AR066527 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVINSON, HOWARD · 2014 to 2015
$1.3M
Imaging Nonlinear Absorption of Biomarkers for Improved Detection of MelanomaRC1CA145105 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WARREN S · 2009 to 2010
$998k
Novel Techniques in Nonlinear Optical Microscopy for Improving Melanoma DiagnosisF32CA168497 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, JESSE WILLIAM · 2013 to 2015
$129k
NCI NIH HHS 1F32CA168497-01A1NCI NIH HHS 1RC1CA145105NCI NIH HHS F32 CA168497NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166555NCI NIH HHS R01-CA166555NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA145105NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR066527NIAMS NIH HHS P30-AR066527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate a multimodal approach that combines a pump-probe with confocal reflectance and multiphoton autofluorescence microscopy. Pump-probe microscopy has been proven to be of great value in analyzing thin tissue sections of pigmented lesions, as it produces molecular contrast which is inaccessible by other means. However, the higher optical intensity required to overcome scattering in thick tissue leads to higher-order nonlinearities in the optical response of melanin (e.g., two-photon pump and one-photon probe) that present additional challenges for interpreting the data. We show that analysis of pigment composition in vivo must carefully account for signal terms that are nonlinear with respect to the pump and probe intensities. We find that pump-probe imaging gives useful contrast for pigmented structures over a large range of spatial scales (100 μm to 1 cm), making it a potentially useful tool for tracking the progression of pigmented lesions without the need to introduce exogenous contrast agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaHumansKeratinocytesMelaninsMelanocytesMelanomaMiceMicroscopyMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNeoplasm TransplantationPhotonsSkinSkin NeoplasmsSkin PigmentationContrast MediaMelanins

Identifiers

PMID25415567
PMCPMC4409034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.