Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25415414›Full record

Trial reportJournal of athletic training2015

Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.

David J Bradbury-Squires, Jennifer C Noftall, Kathleen M Sullivan, David G Behm, Kevin E Power, Duane C Button

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of athletic training, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05328830 (Comparison of the Effects of Instrumental Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Foam Roller on Delayed Muscle Pain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05328830 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Instrumental Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Foam Roller on Delayed Muscle Pain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEastern Mediterranean UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled42ConditionsPerformanceArmsInstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization, Foam Roller
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Influence of Self-Myofascial Release on Muscle Flexibility in Long-Distance Runners.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J Bradbury-SquiresSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada.
Jennifer C Noftall
Kathleen M Sullivan
David G Behm
Kevin E Power
Duane C Button

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRoller massagers are used as a recovery and rehabilitative tool to initiate muscle relaxation and improve range of motion (ROM) and muscular performance. However, research demonstrating such effects is lacking.

objectiveTo determine the effects of applying a roller massager for 20 and 60 seconds on knee-joint ROM and dynamic muscular performance.

designRandomized controlled clinical trial.

settingUniversity laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTen recreationally active men (age = 26.6 ± 5.2 years, height = 175.3 ± 4.3 cm, mass = 84.4 ± 8.8 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed 3 randomized experimental conditions separated by 24 to 48 hours. In condition 1 (5 repetitions of 20 seconds) and condition 2 (5 repetitions of 60 seconds), they applied a roller massager to the quadriceps muscles. Condition 3 served as a control condition in which participants sat quietly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Visual analog pain scale, electromyography (EMG) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps femoris during roller massage and lunge, and knee-joint ROM.

resultsWe found no differences in pain between the 20-second and 60-second roller-massager conditions. During 60 seconds of roller massage, pain was 13.5% (5.7 ± 0.70) and 20.6% (6.2 ± 0.70) greater at 40 seconds and 60 seconds, respectively, than at 20 seconds (P < .05). During roller massage, VL and biceps femoris root mean square (RMS) EMG was 8% and 7%, respectively, of RMS EMG recorded during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Knee-joint ROM was 10% and 16% greater in the 20-second and 60-second roller-massager conditions, respectively, than the control condition (P < .05). Finally, average lunge VL RMS EMG decreased as roller-massage time increased (P < .05).

conclusionsRoller massage was painful and induced muscle activity, but it increased knee-joint ROM and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge.

Indexed as

Knee JointMassageMusculoskeletal PainQuadriceps MuscleAdultElectromyographyEquipment DesignHumansIsometric ContractionMalePain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularThighTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeelectromyographyflexibilitymuscle activationpainstretch

Identifiers

PMID25415414
PMCPMC4495431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.