Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25415331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Clinical application of micronucleus test: a case-control study on the prediction of breast cancer risk/susceptibility.

Claudia Bolognesi, Paolo Bruzzi, Viviana Gismondi, Samantha Volpi, Valeria Viassolo, Simona Pedemonte, Liliana Varesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Micronucleus Assay: The State of Art, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia BolognesiUnit of Environmental Carcinogenesis, IRCCS AUO San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Paolo BruzziUnit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Viviana GismondiUnit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Samantha VolpiUnit of Environmental Carcinogenesis, IRCCS AUO San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Valeria ViassoloUnit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Simona PedemonteUnit of Environmental Carcinogenesis, IRCCS AUO San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
Liliana VarescoUnit of Hereditary Cancer, IRCCS San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The micronucleus test is a well-established DNA damage assay in human monitoring. The test was proposed as a promising marker of cancer risk/susceptibility mainly on the basis of studies on breast cancer. Our recent meta-analysis showed that the association between micronuclei frequency, either at baseline or after irradiation, and breast cancer risk or susceptibility, has been evaluated in few studies of small size, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study is to investigate the role of micronucleus assay in evaluating individual breast cancer susceptibility. Two-hundred and twenty untreated breast cancer patients and 295 female controls were enrolled in the study. All women were characterized for cancer family history and 155 subjects were evaluated for the presence of BRCA mutations. Micronuclei frequency was evaluated at baseline and after irradiation with 1-Gy gamma rays from a 137Cs source. The results show a non significant increase of frequency of micronucleated binucleated lymphocytes in cancer patients compared with the controls at baseline (Mean (S.E.): 16.8 (0.7) vs 15.7 (0.5), but not after irradiation (Mean (S.E.): 145.8 (3.0) vs 154.0 (2.6)). Neither a family history of breast cancer nor the presence of a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1/2 genes were associated with an increased micronuclei frequency. Our results do not support a significant role of micronucleus frequency as a biomarker of breast cancer risk/susceptibility.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMicronucleus TestsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25415331
PMCPMC4240584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.