Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414778›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules & therapeutics2014

Conditioned place preference and self-administration induced by nicotine in adolescent and adult rats.

Hafiz Muhammad Ahsan, June Bryan I de la Peña, Chrislean Jun Botanas, Hee Jin Kim, Gu Yong Yu, Jae Hoon Cheong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors influencing JUUL e-cigarette nicotine vapour-induced reward, withdrawal, pharmacokinetics and brain connectivity in rats: sex matters.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Nicotine on the developing brain.Pharmacological research · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Animal Research on Nicotine Reduction: Current Evidence and Research Gaps.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hafiz Muhammad AhsanUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742.
June Bryan I de la PeñaUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742.
Chrislean Jun BotanasUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742.
Hee Jin KimUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742.
Gu Yong YuDepartment of Chemistry, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hoon CheongUimyung Research Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul 139-742.
Sahmyook University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine addiction is a worldwide problem. However, previous studies characterizing the rewarding and reinforcing effects of nicotine in animal models have reported inconsistent findings. It was observed that the addictive effects are variable on different factors (e.g. route, dose, and age). Here, we evaluated the rewarding and reinforcing effects of nicotine in different routes of administration, across a wide dose range, and in different age groups. Two of the most widely used animal models of drug addiction were employed: the conditioned place preference (CPP) and self-administration (SA) tests. Nicotine CPP was evaluated in different routes [intraperitoneal (i.p.) and subcutaneous (s.c.)], doses (0.05 to 1.0 mg/kg) and age [adolescent and adult rats]. Similarly, intravenous nicotine SA was assessed in different doses (0.01 to 0.06 mg/kg/infusion) and age (adolescent and adult rats). In the CPP test, s.c. nicotine produced greater response than i.p. The 0.2 mg/kg dose produced highest CPP response in adolescent, while 0.6 mg/kg in adult rats; which were also confirmed in 7 days pretreated rats. In the SA test, adolescent rats readily self-administer 0.03 mg/kg/infusion of nicotine. Doses that produced nicotine CPP and SA induced blood nicotine levels that corresponded well with human smokers. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that nicotine produces reliable CPP [0.2 mg/kg dose (s.c.)] in adolescents and [0.6 mg/kg dose (s.c.)] in adults, and SA [0.03 mg/kg/infusion] in adolescent rats. Both tests indicate that adolescent rats are more sensitive to the rewarding and reinforcing effects of nicotine.

Indexed as

AddictionAdolescentAdultsConditioned place preferenceNicotineSelf-administration

Identifiers

PMID25414778
PMCPMC4201227
OpenAlexW1997679425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.