Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414593›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2014

Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus ultrasound-guided combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block for hip replacement surgery in elderly high-risk patients: a prospective randomised study.

Mehmet Aksoy, Aysenur Dostbil, Ilker Ince, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Hacı Ahmet Alici, Ali Aydin, Osman Ozgur Kilinc

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anesthetic management of geriatric patients.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Peripheral nerve blocks for above knee amputation in high-risk patients.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet AksoyDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Aysenur DostbilDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ilker InceDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ali AhiskaliogluDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Hacı Ahmet AliciDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ali AydinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Osman Ozgur KilincDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim is to compare the hemodynamic effects of combined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve block (PCSNB) with continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) in elderly high-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

methodsSeventy patients over the age of 60 with ASA III or IV physical status were randomly allocated to two groups: In the PCSNB group, ultrasound-guided psoas compartment block was performed with modified Winnie technique using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200.000 epinephrine (5 μgr/mL) and iliac crest block was performed using the same local anaesthetic solution (5 mL). All patients in the PCSNB group needed continuing infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg/h) during operation. In the CSA group, CSA was performed in the L3-L4 interspaced with the patient in lateral decubitus position using 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%. When sensory block was not reached to the level of T12 within 10 minutes in the CSA group, additional 2.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% was administered through the catheter at 5-min intervals by limiting the total dose of 15 mg until a T12 level of the sensory block was achieved.

resultsThe PCSNB group had significantly higher mean arterial blood pressure values at the beginning of surgery and at 5(th), 10(th) and 20(th) minutes of surgery compared to the CSA group (P = 0.038, P = 0.029, P = 0.012, P = 0.009 respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation values during surgery and the postoperative period (P >0.05). Arterial hypotension required ephedrine was observed in 13 patients in the CSA and 4 patients in the PCSNB group (P =0.012).

conclusionsCSA and PCSNB produce satisfactory quality of anaesthesia in elderly high-risk patients with fewer hemodynamic changes in PCSNB cases compared with CSA cases.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000658617, Registered 24 June 2014.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBlood PressureBupivacaineEpinephrineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNerve BlockProspective StudiesPsoas MusclesSciatic NerveAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineAnaesthesia techniqueCombined psoas compartment-sciatic nerve blockContinuous spinal anaesthesiaHigh-risk patientHip surgery

Identifiers

PMID25414593
PMCPMC4237736
OpenAlexW2012082434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.