Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414345›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

The SUPERFAMILY 1.75 database in 2014: a doubling of data.

Matt E Oates, Jonathan Stahlhacke, Dimitrios V Vavoulis, Ben Smithers, Owen J L Rackham, Adam J Sardar, Jan Zaucha, Natalie Thurlby, Hai Fang, Julian Gough

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improved global protein homolog detection with major gains in function identification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Biochemistry · 2022
    Article
  13. Comparison of functional classification systems.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matt E OatesComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK Matt.Oates@bristol.ac.uk.
Jonathan StahlhackeComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.
Dimitrios V VavoulisComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.
Ben SmithersComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9508-8065
Owen J L RackhamComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Adam J SardarComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK e-Therapeutics plc,17 Blenheim Office Park, Long Hanborough, Oxfordshire, OX29 8LN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-6125
Jan ZauchaComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK Bristol Centre for Complexity Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3289-4590
Natalie ThurlbyComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK Bristol Centre for Complexity Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-0286
Hai FangComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.
Julian GoughComputer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022771/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018543/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present updates to the SUPERFAMILY 1.75 (http://supfam.org) online resource and protein sequence collection. The hidden Markov model library that provides sequence homology to SCOP structural domains remains unchanged at version 1.75. In the last 4 years SUPERFAMILY has more than doubled its holding of curated complete proteomes over all cellular life, from 1400 proteomes reported previously in 2010 up to 3258 at present. Outside of the main sequence collection, SUPERFAMILY continues to provide domain annotation for sequences provided by other resources such as: UniProt, Ensembl, PDB, much of JGI Phytozome and selected subcollections of NCBI RefSeq. Despite this growth in data volume, SUPERFAMILY now provides users with an expanded and daily updated phylogenetic tree of life (sTOL). This tree is built with genomic-scale domain annotation data as before, but constantly updated when new species are introduced to the sequence library. Our Gene Ontology and other functional and phenotypic annotations previously reported have stood up to critical assessment by the function prediction community. We have now introduced these data in an integrated manner online at the level of an individual sequence, and--in the case of whole genomes--with enrichment analysis against a taxonomically defined background.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Structure, TertiaryGene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyProteinsProteomeSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID25414345
PMCPMC4383889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.