Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414242›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2015

Green tea extract attenuates muscle loss and improves muscle function during disuse, but fails to improve muscle recovery following unloading in aged rats.

Stephen E Alway, Brian T Bennett, Joseph C Wilson, Justin Sperringer, Junaith S Mohamed, Neile K Edens, Suzette L Pereira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Resveratrol Enhances Exercise-Induced Cellular and Functional Adaptations of Skeletal Muscle in Older Men and Women.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen E AlwayLaboratory of Muscle Biology and Sarcopenia, Department of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; West Virginia Center for Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia; Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; and salway@hsc.wvu.edu.
Brian T BennettLaboratory of Muscle Biology and Sarcopenia, Department of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; and.
Joseph C WilsonLaboratory of Muscle Biology and Sarcopenia, Department of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; and.
Justin SperringerLaboratory of Muscle Biology and Sarcopenia, Department of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; and.
Junaith S MohamedLaboratory of Muscle Biology and Sarcopenia, Department of Exercise Physiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; Center for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia; and.
Neile K EdensStrategic R&D, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio.
Suzette L PereiraStrategic R&D, Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio.
West Virginia University · USAbbott Nutrition (United States)

Funding

WVU &MU NEW FACULTY GRANTSP20RR016477 · NCRR · MARSHALL UNIVERSITY · PI RANKIN, GARY O · 2001 to 2011
$35.5M
THE ROLE OF HEF1 PROTEIN IN INVASION OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCERP20RR016440 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2001 to 2010
$22.8M
West Virginia Flow Cytometry Core FacilityP30GM103488 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI CUFF, CHRISTOPHER F · 2012 to 2016
$4.8M
COBRE FOR SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND CANCER PHASE IIIP30RR032138 · NCRR · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI GIBSON, LAURA F. · 2011 to 2011
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P2-0RR-016440NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016440NCRR NIH HHS P20-RR-016477NCRR NIH HHS P30 RR032138NCRR NIH HHS P30-RR-032138NIGMS NIH HHS GM-103488NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we tested the hypothesis that green tea extract (GTE) would improve muscle recovery after reloading following disuse. Aged (32 mo) Fischer 344 Brown Norway rats were randomly assigned to receive either 14 days of hindlimb suspension (HLS) or 14 days of HLS followed by normal ambulatory function for 14 days (recovery). Additional animals served as cage controls. The rats were given GTE (50 mg/kg body wt) or water (vehicle) by gavage 7 days before and throughout the experimental periods. Compared with vehicle treatment, GTE significantly attenuated the loss of hindlimb plantaris muscle mass (-24.8% vs. -10.7%, P < 0.05) and tetanic force (-43.7% vs. -25.9%, P <0.05) during HLS. Although GTE failed to further improve recovery of muscle function or mass compared with vehicle treatment, animals given green tea via gavage maintained the lower losses of muscle mass that were found during HLS (-25.2% vs. -16.0%, P < 0.05) and force (-45.7 vs. -34.4%, P < 0.05) after the reloading periods. In addition, compared with vehicle treatment, GTE attenuated muscle fiber cross-sectional area loss in both plantaris (-39.9% vs. -23.9%, P < 0.05) and soleus (-37.2% vs. -17.6%) muscles after HLS. This green tea-induced difference was not transient but was maintained over the reloading period for plantaris (-45.6% vs. -21.5%, P <0.05) and soleus muscle fiber cross-sectional area (-38.7% vs. -10.9%, P <0.05). GTE increased satellite cell proliferation and differentiation in plantaris and soleus muscles during recovery from HLS compared with vehicle-treated muscles and decreased oxidative stress and abundance of the Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), yet this did not further improve muscle recovery in reloaded muscles. These data suggest that muscle recovery following disuse in aging is complex. Although satellite cell proliferation and differentiation are critical for muscle repair to occur, green tea-induced changes in satellite cell number is by itself insufficient to improve muscle recovery following a period of atrophy in old rats.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsbcl-2-Associated X ProteinCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHindlimb SuspensionMaleMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaOrgan SizeOxidative StressPlant ExtractsRatsRats, Inbred BNbcl-2-Associated X ProteinPlant ExtractsTeaapoptosiscatechindisuseEGCgexercisemuscle atrophyreloadingsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID25414242
PMCPMC4312851
OpenAlexW2124142131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.