Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25414003›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2015

Critique of the analysis of UpToDate.com on the treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures: time to update UpToDate.

D P Beall, W P McRoberts, S H Berven, J T Ledlie, S M Tutton, B P Parsons

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D P BeallFrom Radiology Services (D.P.B.), Clinical Radiology of Oklahoma, Musculoskeletal Imaging and Interventional, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma db@clinrad.org.
W P McRobertsInterventional Spine and Pain Medicine (W.P.M.), Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
S H BervenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.H.B.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J T LedlieTyler Neurosurgery (J.T.L.), Tyler, Texas.
S M TuttonDepartments of Radiology and Surgery (S.M.T.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert East Clinic, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
B P ParsonsDepartment of Radiology (B.P.P.), University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Edmond, Oklahoma.
Froedtert Hospital · USHoly Cross Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures has changed substantially since the introduction of vertebroplasty in the mid-1980s and balloon kyphoplasty in the late 1990s. Both procedures were widely accepted with the vertebral fractures treated reaching 150,000 per annum in 2009 prior to the publication of 2 randomized controlled trials comparing vertebroplasty with a sham treatment published in the New England Journal of Medicine in August 2009. Since then, there has been a flood of information on vertebral augmentation and balloon kyphoplasty. It is worth evaluating this information especially because it relates to current recommendations that are often followed blindly by medical and administrative groups unfamiliar with either the procedure or the high level of evidence surrounding vertebral augmentation. To streamline the evaluation of some current recommendations, we limited the analysis to the recommendations found on UpToDate.com. This Web site is an evidence-based, peer-reviewed source of information available for patients, doctors, health insurance companies, and population-based medical decision-making.

Indexed as

InternetKyphoplastyVertebroplastyEvidence-Based MedicineFractures, CompressionHumansInformation DisseminationSpinal FracturesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25414003
PMCPMC7964295
OpenAlexW2169129377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.