Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413924›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

Effect of antimicrobial use on pneumococcal diagnostic tests in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

A Saukkoriipi, A A Palmu, J Jokinen, V Verlant, W P Hausdorff, T M Kilpi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Culture of all sputum samples irrespective of quality adds value to the diagnosis of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. The Effect of Antibiotic Exposure and Specimen Volume on the Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Children With Pneumonia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A preliminary study on the potential ofJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A SaukkoriipiDepartment of Vaccination and Immune Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 310, 90101, Oulu, Finland, annika.saukkoriipi@thl.fi.
A A Palmu
J Jokinen
V Verlant
W P Hausdorff
T M Kilpi
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial treatment decreases bacterial culture yields. We assessed the impact of antimicrobial treatment on pneumococcal assays in a prospective study of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the elderly. We enrolled 323 cases aged ≥65 years with radiologically confirmed CAP and collected detailed data on antimicrobial exposure and pneumococcal assays on various samples. Complete antimicrobial use data were available for 303 (94%) cases; 61% had no antimicrobial exposure, 19% had received antibiotics at the acute visit only, and 20% within 2 weeks before the acute visit (15% ongoing and 5 % completed treatment). Ongoing use before the visit reduced pneumococcal detection by culture (nasopharyngeal swab 2 vs. 16% in the unexposed; high-quality sputum 0 vs. 25%) and sputum lytA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (0 vs. 25%). Urine antigen test and serology were not affected. Among those who had received antibiotics only at the acute visit before study sampling, serology (29 vs. 15%), urine antigen (19 vs. 8%), and blood culture (9 vs. 2%) were more often positive than among the unexposed. Antimicrobial exposure before the visit reduced both culture and PCR-based detection. Patients given antibiotics at the visit had higher proportions of positive blood culture, serology, and urine antigen tests, suggesting higher pneumococcal CAP prevalence.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleNasopharynxPneumonia, PneumococcalPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySputumStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25413924
OpenAlexW2093946631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.