Trial reportPhysical therapy2015
Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study.
Trial report in Physical therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis
Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury (tDCS in Pediatric ABI)
Effects of Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive brain stimulation for upper limb motor activity in children and young adults with cerebral palsy and pediatric stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treatment of refractory epilepsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Motor Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Nonpharmacological rehabilitation interventions for motor and cognitive outcomes following pediatric stroke: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Pooled it
- Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2023Trial
- Feasibility and efficacy of remotely supervised cranial electrical stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled pilot study.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2020Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2018Trial
- Sensorimotor Robotic Measures of tDCS- and HD-tDCS-Enhanced Motor Learning in Children.Neural plasticity · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/Behavioral Intervention Clinical Trial: Long-Term Follow-Up of Outcomes in Congenital Hemiparesis.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Synergistic effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation/constraint-induced movement therapy in children and young adults with hemiparesis: study protocol.BMC pediatrics · 2015Trial
- Self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled study.Brain stimulationTrial
- Does a second course of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance neuroplasticity and motor function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy? Results of a prospective study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Examining tolerability, safety, and blinding in 1032 transcranial electrical stimulation sessions for children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- TOPSS: TOlerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in Pediatric Stroke Survivors.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Safety and Tolerability of tDCS across Different Ages, Sexes, Diagnoses, and Amperages: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Remotely monitored transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric cerebral palsy: open label trial protocol.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that has shown improved adult stroke outcomes. Applying tDCS in children with congenital hemiparesis has not yet been explored.
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of single-session tDCS through an adverse events profile and symptom assessment within a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled preliminary study in children with congenital hemiparesis. A secondary objective was to assess the stability of hand and cognitive function.
designA double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled pretest/posttest/follow-up study was conducted.
settingThe study was conducted in a university pediatric research laboratory.
participantsThirteen children, ages 7 to 18 years, with congenital hemiparesis participated. MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events/safety assessment and hand function were measured.
interventionParticipants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group, with safety and functional assessments at pretest, at posttest on the same day, and at a 1-week follow-up session. An intervention of 10 minutes of 0.7 mA tDCS was applied to bilateral primary motor cortices. The tDCS intervention was considered safe if there was no individual decline of 25% or group decline of 2 standard deviations for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and behavioral data and no report of adverse events.
resultsNo major adverse events were found, including no seizures. Two participants did not complete the study due to lack of MEP and discomfort. For the 11 participants who completed the study, group differences in MEPs and behavioral data did not exceed 2 standard deviations in those who received the tDCS (n=5) and those in the control group (n=6). The study was completed without the need for stopping per medical monitor and biostatisticial analysis. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of the study was the small sample size, with data available for 11 participants.
conclusionsBased on the results of this study, tDCS appears to be safe, feasible, and well tolerated in most children with hemiparesis. Future investigations of serial sessions of tDCS in conjunction with rehabilitation in pediatric hemiparesis are indicated to explore the benefit of a synergistic approach to improving hand function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.