Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413621›Full record

Trial reportPhysical therapy2015

Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric hemiparesis: randomized controlled preliminary study.

Bernadette T Gillick, Tim Feyma, Jeremiah Menk, Michelle Usset, Amy Vaith, Teddi Jean Wood, Rebecca Worthington, Linda E Krach

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physical therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01636661 early_phase1completednot on this map

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Hemiparesis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2012 to 2013Enrolled13ConditionsHemiparesisArmstDCS
NCT03618849 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury (tDCS in Pediatric ABI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.Ran2019 to 2024Enrolled1ConditionsAcquired Brain Injury, Disorders of ConsciousnessArmstDCS
NCT03635775 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsCerebral Palsy, Perinatal Stroke, Periventricular LeukomalaciaArmsActive tDCS, Sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treatment of refractory epilepsy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized, blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette T GillickB.T. Gillick, PT, MSPT, PhD, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (USA). gillick@umn.edu.
Tim FeymaT. Feyma, MD, Pediatric Neurology, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St Paul, Minnesota.
Jeremiah MenkJ. Menk, MS, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michelle UssetM. Usset, DPT, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota.
Amy VaithA. Vaith, DPT, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota.
Teddi Jean WoodT.J. Wood, DPT, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota.
Rebecca WorthingtonR. Worthington, DPT, Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota.
Linda E KrachL.E. Krach, MD, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · USGillette Children's Specialty Healthcare · USMinnesota West Community & Technical College · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that has shown improved adult stroke outcomes. Applying tDCS in children with congenital hemiparesis has not yet been explored.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of single-session tDCS through an adverse events profile and symptom assessment within a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled preliminary study in children with congenital hemiparesis. A secondary objective was to assess the stability of hand and cognitive function.

designA double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled pretest/posttest/follow-up study was conducted.

settingThe study was conducted in a university pediatric research laboratory.

participantsThirteen children, ages 7 to 18 years, with congenital hemiparesis participated. MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events/safety assessment and hand function were measured.

interventionParticipants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group, with safety and functional assessments at pretest, at posttest on the same day, and at a 1-week follow-up session. An intervention of 10 minutes of 0.7 mA tDCS was applied to bilateral primary motor cortices. The tDCS intervention was considered safe if there was no individual decline of 25% or group decline of 2 standard deviations for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and behavioral data and no report of adverse events.

resultsNo major adverse events were found, including no seizures. Two participants did not complete the study due to lack of MEP and discomfort. For the 11 participants who completed the study, group differences in MEPs and behavioral data did not exceed 2 standard deviations in those who received the tDCS (n=5) and those in the control group (n=6). The study was completed without the need for stopping per medical monitor and biostatisticial analysis. LIMITATIONS: A limitation of the study was the small sample size, with data available for 11 participants.

conclusionsBased on the results of this study, tDCS appears to be safe, feasible, and well tolerated in most children with hemiparesis. Future investigations of serial sessions of tDCS in conjunction with rehabilitation in pediatric hemiparesis are indicated to explore the benefit of a synergistic approach to improving hand function.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAge FactorsChildDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, MotorFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHand StrengthHumansMaleParesisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25413621
PMCPMC4348714
OpenAlexW2102952992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.