Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413377›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2015

Linezolid plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations in critically ill obese patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: intermittent vs continuous administration.

Gennaro De Pascale, Serena Fortuna, Mario Tumbarello, Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, MariaSole Vallecoccia, Teresa Spanu, Giuseppe Bello, Luca Montini, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Pierluigi Navarra and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Continuous Infusion of Linezolid: Explaining the Discrepant Survival Outcomes between Two Studies.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous vs Intermittent Linezolid Infusion in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gennaro De PascaleDepartment of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, gennaro.depascale@email.it.
Serena Fortuna
Mario Tumbarello
Salvatore Lucio Cutuli
MariaSole Vallecoccia
Teresa Spanu
Giuseppe Bello
Luca Montini
Mariano Alberto Pennisi
Pierluigi Navarra
Massimo Antonelli
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of the Sacred Heart · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinical application of an antibiotic's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties may improve the outcome of severe infections. No data are available on the use of linezolid (LNZ) continuous infusion in critically ill obese patients affected by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

methodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare LNZ concentrations in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF), when administered by intermittent and continuous infusion (II, CI), in obese critically ill patients affected by VAP.

resultsTwenty-two critically ill obese patients were enrolled. At the steady state, in the II group, mean ± SD total and unbound maximum-minimum concentrations (C max/C max,u - C min/Cmin,u) were 10 ± 3.7/6.8 ± 2.6 mg/L and 1.7 ± 1.1/1.2 ± 0.8 mg/L, respectively. In the CI group, the mean ± SD total and unbound plasma concentrations (C ss and C ss,u) were 6.2 ± 2.3 and 4.3 ± 1.6 mg/L, respectively. Within a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 1-4 mg/L, the median (IQR) time LNZ plasma concentration persisted above MIC (% T > MIC) was significantly higher in the CI than the II group [100 (100-100) vs 100 (89-100), p = 0.05; 100 (100-100) vs 82 (54.8-98.8), p = 0.009; 100 (74.2-100) vs 33 (30.2-78.5), p = 0.005; respectively]. Pulmonary penetration (%) was higher in the CI group, as confirmed by a Monte Carlo simulation [98.8 (IQR 93.8-104.3) vs 87.1 (IQR 78.7-95.4); p < 0.001].

conclusionsIn critically ill obese patients affected by VAP, LNZ CI may overcome the limits of standard administration but these advantages are less evident with difficult to treat pathogens (MIC = 4 mg/L). These data support the usefulness of LNZ continuous infusion, combined with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in selected critically ill populations.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLinezolidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedObesityOrgan Dysfunction ScoresOxazolidinonesPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidOxazolidinones

Identifiers

PMID25413377
OpenAlexW1992079605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.