Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413287›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2014

Adaptive developmental plasticity: compartmentalized responses to environmental cues and to corresponding internal signals provide phenotypic flexibility.

Ana Rita A Mateus, Manuel Marques-Pita, Vicencio Oostra, Elvira Lafuente, Paul M Brakefield, Bas J Zwaan, Patrícia Beldade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Rita A MateusInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, P-2780, Oeiras, Portugal. armateus@igc.gulbenkian.pt.
Manuel Marques-PitaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, P-2780, Oeiras, Portugal. mmpita@igc.gulbenkian.pt.
Vicencio OostraInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333, BE Leiden, The Netherlands. vicencio-oostra@dds.nl.
Elvira LafuenteInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, P-2780, Oeiras, Portugal. elafuente@igc.gulbenkian.pt.
Paul M BrakefieldInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333, BE Leiden, The Netherlands. pb499@cam.ac.uk.
Bas J ZwaanLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB Wageningen, The Netherlands. bas.zwaan@wur.nl.
Patrícia BeldadeInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, P-2780, Oeiras, Portugal. pbeldade@igc.gulbenkian.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe environmental regulation of development can result in the production of distinct phenotypes from the same genotype and provide the means for organisms to cope with environmental heterogeneity. The effect of the environment on developmental outcomes is typically mediated by hormonal signals which convey information about external cues to the developing tissues. While such plasticity is a wide-spread property of development, not all developing tissues are equally plastic. To understand how organisms integrate environmental input into coherent adult phenotypes, we must know how different body parts respond, independently or in concert, to external cues and to the corresponding internal signals.

resultsWe quantified the effect of temperature and ecdysone hormone manipulations on post-growth tissue patterning in an experimental model of adaptive developmental plasticity, the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Following a suite of traits evolving by natural or sexual selection, we found that different groups of cells within the same tissue have sensitivities and patterns of response that are surprisingly distinct for the external environmental cue and for the internal hormonal signal. All but those wing traits presumably involved in mate choice responded to developmental temperature and, of those, all but the wing traits not exposed to predators responded to hormone manipulations. On the other hand, while patterns of significant response to temperature contrasted traits on autonomously-developing wings, significant response to hormone manipulations contrasted neighboring groups of cells with distinct color fates. We also showed that the spatial compartmentalization of these responses cannot be explained by the spatial or temporal compartmentalization of the hormone receptor protein.

conclusionsOur results unravel the integration of different aspects of the adult phenotype into developmental and functional units which both reflect and impact evolutionary change. Importantly, our findings underscore the complexity of the interactions between environment and physiology in shaping the development of different body parts.

Indexed as

CuesEnvironmentPhenotypeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsButterfliesEvolution, MolecularGenotypeHormonesWings, AnimalHormones

Identifiers

PMID25413287
PMCPMC4275937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.