Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413280›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2015

[Pathophysiology and etiology of the Charcot foot].

K Trieb, S G Hofstätter

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K TriebAbteilung für Orthopädie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Grieskirchnerstr. 42, 4600, Wels, Österreich, klemens.trieb@klinikum-wegr.at.
S G Hofstätter
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite extensive research, the pathophysiology of Charcot foot is still not fully understood. In the case of late diagnosis and insufficient therapy, severe deformity may occur.

objectivesDifferent theories on the pathophysiology of the Charcot foot are presented and discussed. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis article presents different theories on the pathophysiology of the Charcot foot and presents studies on the cellular, immunological, and bone metabolism level.

resultsOne theory is based on repetitive microtraumas in the sensoric deficient foot which lead to development of Charcot foot. Another theory is based on pathologic neurovascular innervation leading to morphologic changes. Probably both mechanisms are responsible in combination as etiological factors inducing neuropathy

conclusionA combination of mechanical, vascular, and biologic factors induce the neuropathic foot and result in severe deformity if diagnosis is too late.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalArthropathy, NeurogenicDiabetic FootFoot DeformitiesFoot InjuriesHumans

Identifiers

PMID25413280
OpenAlexW445838647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.