Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25413162›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2015

Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.

Beibei Guo, Yisheng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A modular framework for early-phase seamless oncology trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  6. A surface-free design for phase I dual-agent combination trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  10. A dose-schedule finding design for phase I-II clinical trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beibei GuoDepartment of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, U.S.A.
Yisheng Li

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecularly targeted agent (MTA) combination therapy is in the early stages of development. When using a fixed dose of one agent in combinations of MTAs, toxicity and efficacy do not necessarily increase with an increasing dose of the other agent. Thus, in dose-finding trials for combinations of MTAs, interest may lie in identifying the optimal biological dose combinations (OBDCs), defined as the lowest dose combinations (in a certain sense) that are safe and have the highest efficacy level meeting a prespecified target. The limited existing designs for these trials use parametric dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity models. Motivated by a phase I/II clinical trial of a combination of two MTAs in patients with pancreatic, endometrial, or colorectal cancer, we propose Bayesian dose-finding designs to identify the OBDCs without parametric model assumptions. The proposed approach is based only on partial stochastic ordering assumptions for the effects of the combined MTAs and uses isotonic regression to estimate partially stochastically ordered marginal posterior distributions of the efficacy and toxicity probabilities. We demonstrate that our proposed method appropriately accounts for the partial ordering constraints, including potential plateaus on the dose-response surfaces, and is computationally efficient. We develop a dose-combination-finding algorithm to identify the OBDCs. We use simulations to compare the proposed designs with an alternative design based on Bayesian isotonic regression transformation and a design based on parametric change-point dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy models and demonstrate desirable operating characteristics of the proposed designs.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDose-Response Relationship, DrugAlgorithmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiostatisticsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicComputer SimulationHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseModels, StatisticalMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRegression AnalysisStochastic ProcessesBayesian isotonic regression transformationdose-efficacy surfacedose-toxicity surfacematrix orderingplateaupost processing

Identifiers

PMID25413162
PMCPMC4359011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.