ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015
Expression of SOX9 and CDX2 in nongoblet columnar-lined esophagus predicts the detection of Barrett's esophagus during follow-up.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of bile acid in intestinal metaplasia.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus: an overview with an histologic diagnostic approach.Pathologica · 2020Review
- CDX-2 Expression in Esophageal Biopsies Without Goblet Cell Intestinal Metaplasia May Be Predictive of Barrett's Esophagus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Activin A-mediated epithelial de-differentiation contributes to injury repair in an in vitro gastrointestinal reflux model.Cytokine · 2019Article
- The cyclical hit model: how paligenosis might establish the mutational landscape in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus in the United States requires both endoscopically evident columnar-lined esophagus and the presence of goblet cells by histology. Currently, there is no consensus on how patients with nongoblet columnar-lined esophagus should be followed. In this study, we investigated whether biomarkers can be used to predict the detection of goblet cells in follow-up biopsies. Patients with nongoblet columnar-lined esophagus were identified. In 13 of these cases, goblet cells were detected in subsequent follow-up endoscopic biopsies (Barrett's group). Additionally, 26 cases that remained negative for goblet cells in follow-up biopsies served as controls. Immunohistochemistry for CDX2, SOX9, BMP4, SHH, and MUC2 was performed on the initial biopsies and graded independently by at least two pathologists in a masked manner. CDX2 was positive in the nongoblet columnar epithelium of 7/13 cases in the Barrett's group and in 4/26 controls (sensitivity 54%, specificity of 85%, odds ratio (OR) 6.4). Strong and diffuse immunoreactivity for SOX9 was detected in 10/13 cases in the Barrett's group and in 1/26 controls (sensitivity 77%, specificity 96%, OR 83.3). Combining CDX2 and SOX9 as a panel increased sensitivity to 85%, although the specificity decreased to 85% (OR 30.3). SHH, BMP4, and MUC2 expression showed no significant difference between the Barrett's and control groups. In patients with nongoblet columnar-lined esophagus, SOX9 and CDX2 may be useful in identifying a subset of patients who have a higher risk of being diagnosed for Barrett's esophagus (developing goblet cells) and need closer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.