ArticleBMC genomics2014
Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic analysis of radiosensitivity in breast cancer : Identifying pathological determinants and assessing genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) for personalized dose escalation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Building flexible and robust analysis frameworks for molecular subtyping of cancers.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- OMICs approaches and technologies for understanding low-high feed efficiency traits in chicken: implication to breeding.Animal biotechnology · 2023Review
- Assessment of stained direct cytology smears of breast cancer for whole transcriptome and targeted messenger RNA sequencing.Cancer cytopathology · 2023Article
- OLFML2A Overexpression Predicts an Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with AML.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
- Genotype-to-Phenotype Associations in the Aggressive Variant Prostate Cancer Molecular Profile (AVPC-m) Components.Cancers · 2022Article
- Particle swarm optimization artificial intelligence technique for gene signature discovery in transcriptomic cohorts.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Two novel qualitative transcriptional signatures robustly applicable to non-research-oriented colorectal cancer samples with low-quality RNA.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- Development and validation for research assessment of Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score, EndoPredict® and Prosigna®.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- A Novel Computational Framework to Predict Disease-Related Copy Number Variations by Integrating Multiple Data Sources.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The Study of Alternative Splicing Events in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells From a Down's Syndrome Patient.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Identification of Hub Genes and Pathways of Triple Negative Breast Cancer by Expression Profiles Analysis.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Changing Technologies of RNA Sequencing and Their Applications in Clinical Oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- QuantSeq. 3' Sequencing combined with Salmon provides a fast, reliable approach for high throughput RNA expression analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The impact of RNA extraction method on accurate RNA sequencing from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Overexpression and alternative splicing of NF-YA in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Using microarray-based subtyping methods for breast cancer in the era of high-throughput RNA sequencing.Molecular oncology · 2018Article
- Mutational signatures and mutable motifs in cancer genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Review
- Fold change based approach for identification of significant network markers in breast, lung and prostate cancer.IET systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroarrays have revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research by enabling studies of gene expression on a transcriptome-wide scale. Recently, RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) has emerged as an alternative for precise readouts of the transcriptome. To date, no study has compared the ability of the two technologies to quantify clinically relevant individual genes and microarray-derived gene expression signatures (GES) in a set of BC samples encompassing the known molecular BC's subtypes. To accomplish this, the RNA from 57 BCs representing the four main molecular subtypes (triple negative, HER2 positive, luminal A, luminal B), was profiled with Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 chips and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The correlations of three clinically relevant BC genes, six molecular subtype classifiers, and a selection of 21 GES were evaluated.
results16,097 genes common to the two platforms were retained for downstream analysis. Gene-wise comparison of microarray and RNA-Seq data revealed that 52% had a Spearman's correlation coefficient greater than 0.7 with highly correlated genes displaying significantly higher expression levels. We found excellent correlation between microarray and RNA-Seq for the estrogen receptor (ER; rs = 0.973; 95% CI: 0.971-0.975), progesterone receptor (PgR; rs = 0.95; 0.947-0.954), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; rs = 0.918; 0.912-0.923), while a few discordances between ER and PgR quantified by immunohistochemistry and RNA-Seq/microarray were observed. All the subtype classifiers evaluated agreed well (Cohen's kappa coefficients >0.8) and all the proliferation-based GES showed excellent Spearman correlations between microarray and RNA-Seq (all rs >0.965). Immune-, stroma- and pathway-based GES showed a lower correlation relative to prognostic signatures (all rs >0.6).
conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to report a systematic comparison of RNA-Seq to microarray for the evaluation of single genes and GES clinically relevant to BC. According to our results, the vast majority of single gene biomarkers and well-established GES can be reliably evaluated using the RNA-Seq technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.