ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2015
Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological pain relief and women´s birth experience: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.Reproductive health · 2019Pooled it
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a "Train the Leader" Model for Disseminating Tai Chi Prime with Fidelity in African American/Black and Latinx Communities: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Implementation Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neuraxial analgesia in pregnant individuals with bleeding disorders: a retrospective descriptive study of obstetric anesthesia practices and outcomes.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Investigating the association between intention for labour epidural analgesia (LEA), actual delivery with LEA and postnatal depression: A secondary analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Parturients' perspectives on labor pain and epidural analgesia: A protocol for an explorative qualitative study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Process of Withdrawal of Mechanical Ventilation at End of Life in the ICU: Clinician Perceptions.CHEST critical care · 2024Article
- Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with pain relief and birth experience among induced and spontaneous-onset labours ending in vaginal birth: A prospective cohort study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023Article
- When expectation and reality clash: birth plans and the anaesthetist.International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2021Article
- Labor prior to cesarean delivery associated with higher post-discharge opioid consumption.PloS one · 2021Article
- Outcomes of intrathecal analgesia in multiparous women undergoing normal vaginal delivery: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.Anesthesiology · 2018Review
- Paradox lost on the U.S.-Mexico border: U.S. Latinas and cesarean rates.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Article
- Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Initiation of labor analgesia with injection of local anesthetic through the epidural needle compared to the catheter.Journal of pain research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost women who give birth in United States hospitals receive neuraxial analgesia to manage pain during labor. In this analysis, we examined themes of the patient experience of neuraxial analgesia among a national sample of U.S. mothers.
methodsData are from the Listening to Mothers II survey, conducted among a national sample of women who delivered a singleton baby in a U.S. hospital in 2005 (N = 1,573). Our study population consisted of women who experienced labor, did not deliver by planned cesarean, and who reported neuraxial analgesia use (n = 914). We analyzed open-ended responses about the best and worst parts of women's birth experiences for themes related to neuraxial analgesia using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThirty-three percent of women (n = 300) mentioned neuraxial analgesia in their open-ended responses. We found that effective pain relief was frequently spontaneously mentioned as a key positive theme in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia. However, some women perceived timing-related challenges with neuraxial analgesia, including waiting in pain for neuraxial analgesia, receiving neuraxial analgesia too late in labor, or feeling that the pain relief from neuraxial analgesia wore off too soon, as negative aspects. Other themes in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia were information and consent, adverse effects of neuraxial analgesia, and plans and expectations.
conclusionsThe findings from this analysis underscored the fact that women appreciate the effective pain relief that neuraxial analgesia provides during childbirth. Although pain control was 1 important facet of women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia, their experiences were also influenced by other factors. Anesthesiologists can work with obstetric clinicians, nurses, childbirth educators, and pregnant and laboring patients to help mitigate some of the challenges with timing, communication, neuraxial analgesia administration, or expectations that may have contributed to negative aspects of women's birth experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.