Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25412403›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2015

Women's Experiences with Neuraxial Labor Analgesia in the Listening to Mothers II Survey: A Content Analysis of Open-Ended Responses.

Laura Attanasio, Katy B Kozhimannil, Judy Jou, Marianne E McPherson, William Camann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. When expectation and reality clash: birth plans and the anaesthetist.International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Investigating a Needle-Based Epidural Procedure in Obstetric Anesthesia.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura AttanasioFrom the Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota; National Institute for Children's Health Quality, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katy B Kozhimannil
Judy Jou
Marianne E McPherson
William Camann
National Institute for Children’s Health Quality · USUniversity of Minnesota · USHarvard University Press · US

Funding

Univ of Minnesota Buidling Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD055887 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ALLEN, SHARON S, BERGE, JERICA M · 2007 to 2023
$8.6M
Work, pregnancy & childbirth-related health care choices, patterns, and qualityR03HD070868 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOZHIMANNIL, KATY BACKES · 2012 to 2013
$140k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055887NICHD NIH HHS K12HD055887NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD070868NICHD NIH HHS R03HD070868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost women who give birth in United States hospitals receive neuraxial analgesia to manage pain during labor. In this analysis, we examined themes of the patient experience of neuraxial analgesia among a national sample of U.S. mothers.

methodsData are from the Listening to Mothers II survey, conducted among a national sample of women who delivered a singleton baby in a U.S. hospital in 2005 (N = 1,573). Our study population consisted of women who experienced labor, did not deliver by planned cesarean, and who reported neuraxial analgesia use (n = 914). We analyzed open-ended responses about the best and worst parts of women's birth experiences for themes related to neuraxial analgesia using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThirty-three percent of women (n = 300) mentioned neuraxial analgesia in their open-ended responses. We found that effective pain relief was frequently spontaneously mentioned as a key positive theme in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia. However, some women perceived timing-related challenges with neuraxial analgesia, including waiting in pain for neuraxial analgesia, receiving neuraxial analgesia too late in labor, or feeling that the pain relief from neuraxial analgesia wore off too soon, as negative aspects. Other themes in women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia were information and consent, adverse effects of neuraxial analgesia, and plans and expectations.

conclusionsThe findings from this analysis underscored the fact that women appreciate the effective pain relief that neuraxial analgesia provides during childbirth. Although pain control was 1 important facet of women's experiences with neuraxial analgesia, their experiences were also influenced by other factors. Anesthesiologists can work with obstetric clinicians, nurses, childbirth educators, and pregnant and laboring patients to help mitigate some of the challenges with timing, communication, neuraxial analgesia administration, or expectations that may have contributed to negative aspects of women's birth experiences.

Indexed as

NarrationSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLabor PainMothersParturitionPatient SatisfactionPregnancyUnited StatesWomenYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25412403
PMCPMC4437967
OpenAlexW1977569236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.