Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25412316›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2014

Centrosome-declustering drugs mediate a two-pronged attack on interphase and mitosis in supercentrosomal cancer cells.

V Pannu, P C G Rida, B Celik, R C Turaga, A Ogden, G Cantuaria, J Gopalakrishnan, R Aneja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Forcing dividing cancer cells to die; low-dose drug combinations to prevent spindle pole clustering.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

V PannuDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
P C G RidaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
B CelikDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
R C TuragaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
A OgdenDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
G CantuariaUniversity of Gynecologic Oncology, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J GopalakrishnanCenter for Molecular Medicine of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
R AnejaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia State University · USNorthside Hospital · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

Evaluation of HSET as a Novel Theranostic Target for Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA169127 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Evaluation of antiangiogenic role of EM011, a novel tubulin-binding agentR00CA131489 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2010 to 2012
$732k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA131489NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical anti-mitotic drugs have failed to translate their preclinical efficacy into clinical response in human trials. Their clinical failure has challenged the notion that tumor cells divide frequently at rates comparable to those of cancer cells in vitro and in xenograft models. Given the preponderance of interphase cells in clinical tumors, we asked whether targeting amplified centrosomes, which cancer cells carefully preserve in a tightly clustered conformation throughout interphase, presents a superior chemotherapeutic strategy that sabotages interphase-specific cellular activities, such as migration. Herein we have utilized supercentrosomal N1E-115 murine neuroblastoma cells as a test-bed to study interphase centrosome declustering induced by putative declustering agents, such as Reduced-9-bromonoscapine (RedBr-Nos), Griseofulvin and PJ-34. We found tight 'supercentrosomal' clusters in the interphase and mitosis of ~80% of patients' tumor cells with excess centrosomes. RedBr-Nos was the strongest declustering agent with a declustering index of 0.36 and completely dispersed interphase centrosome clusters in N1E-115 cells. Interphase centrosome declustering caused inhibition of neurite formation, impairment of cell polarization and Golgi organization, disrupted cellular protrusions and focal adhesion contacts-factors that are crucial prerequisites for directional migration. Thus our data illustrate an interphase-specific potential anti-migratory role of centrosome-declustering agents in addition to their previously acknowledged ability to induce spindle multipolarity and mitotic catastrophe. Centrosome-declustering agents counter centrosome clustering to inhibit directional cell migration in interphase cells and set up multipolar mitotic catastrophe, suggesting that disbanding the nuclear-centrosome-Golgi axis is a potential anti-metastasis strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell PolarityCentrosomeFocal AdhesionsGolgi ApparatusGriseofulvinHumansInterphaseMiceMitosisNeuronsNoscapinePhenanthrenes9-bromo-5-(4,5-dimethoxy-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-1-yl)-4-methoxy-6-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-(1,3)-dioxolo(4,5-g)isoquinolineGriseofulvinNoscapineN-(oxo-5,6-dihydrophenanthridin-2-yl)-N,N-dimethylacetamide hydrochloridePhenanthrenes

Identifiers

PMID25412316
PMCPMC4260758
OpenAlexW1982114544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.