Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25412314›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2014

Combination simvastatin and metformin induces G1-phase cell cycle arrest and Ripk1- and Ripk3-dependent necrosis in C4-2B osseous metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer cells.

M A Babcook, R M Sramkoski, H Fujioka, F Daneshgari, A Almasan, S Shukla, R R Nanavaty, S Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Ras Signaling in Breast Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M A Babcook1] Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA [2] Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine & The Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
R M SramkoskiCytometry & Imaging Microscopy Core Facility, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
H Fujioka1] Electron Microscopy Core Facility and Center for Mitochondrial Disease, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA [2] Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
F DaneshgariDepartment of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine & The Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
A Almasan1] Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA [2] Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.ORCID 0000000289166650
S ShuklaDepartment of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine & The Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
R R NanavatyDepartment of Biomedical Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
S Gupta1] Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA [2] Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine & The Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA [3] Division of General Medical Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USAnywherEnergy (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN METABOLISMT32DK007319 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNENGRABER, HENRI · 1986 to 2013
$5.0M
Therapeutic resistance in leukemic cells: targeting BCL-2 family and autophagyR01CA184137 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ALMASAN, ALEXANDRU · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Cdk-2 Independent role of cyclin E in Cell survivalR01CA127264 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ALMASAN, ALEXANDRU · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA10852NCI NIH HHS R01 CA127264NCI NIH HHS R01CA127264NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184137NIDDK NIH HHS 5T32DK007319NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells acquire resistance to chemotherapy and apoptosis, in part, due to enhanced aerobic glycolysis and biomass production, known as the Warburg effect. We previously demonstrated that combination simvastatin (SIM) and metformin (MET) ameliorates critical Warburg effect-related metabolic aberrations of C4-2B cells, synergistically and significantly decreases CRPC cell viability and metastatic properties, with minimal effect on normal prostate epithelial cells, and inhibits primary prostate tumor growth, metastasis, and biochemical failure in an orthotopic model of metastatic CRPC, more effectively than docetaxel chemotherapy. Several modes of cell death activated by individual treatment of SIM or MET have been reported; however, the cell death process induced by combination SIM and MET treatment in metastatic CRPC cells remains unknown. This must be determined prior to advancing combination SIM and MET to clinical trial for metastatic CRPC. Treatment of C4-2B cells with combination 4 μM SIM and 2 mM MET (SIM+MET) led to significant G1-phase cell cycle arrest and decrease in the percentage of DNA-replicating cells in the S-phase by 24 h; arrest was sustained throughout the 96-h treatment. SIM+MET treatment led to enhanced autophagic flux in C4-2B cells by 72-96 h, ascertained by increased LC3B-II (further enhanced with lysosomal inhibitor chloroquine) and reduced Sequestosome-1 protein expression, significantly increased percentage of acidic vesicular organelle-positive cells, and increased autophagic structure accumulation assessed by transmission electron microscopy. Chloroquine, however, could not rescue CRPC cell viability, eliminating autophagic cell death; rather, autophagy was upregulated by C4-2B cells in attempt to withstand chemotherapy. Instead, SIM+MET treatment led to Ripk1- and Ripk3-dependent necrosis by 48-96 h, determined by propidium iodide-Annexin V flow cytometry, increase in Ripk1 and Ripk3 protein expression, necrosome formation, HMGB-1 extracellular release, and necrotic induction and viability rescue with necrostatin-1 and Ripk3-targeting siRNA. The necrosis-inducing capacity of SIM+MET may make these drugs a highly-effective treatment for apoptosis- and chemotherapy-resistant metastatic CRPC cells.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAutophagyCell Line, TumorChloroquineDrug CombinationsG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHMGB1 ProteinHumansImidazolesIndolesMaleMetforminMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNecrosisProstateAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingChloroquineDrug CombinationsHMGB1 ProteinHMGB1 protein, humanImidazolesIndolesMAP1LC3B protein, humanMetforminMicrotubule-Associated Proteinsnecrostatin-1Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRIPK1 protein, humanRIPK3 protein, humanRNA, Small InterferingSequestosome-1 ProteinSimvastatinSQSTM1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25412314
PMCPMC4260755
OpenAlexW1990317839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.