Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25412237›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Reply to Comment on: 'Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers'.

H Checkoway, J I Lundin, S Costello, R M Ray, W Li, E A Eisen, G Astrakianakis, K Applebaum, D L Gao, D B Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Textile industry and occupational cancer.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

H CheckowayDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
J I LundinDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
S CostelloDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
R M RayDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
W LiDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
E A EisenDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
G AstrakianakisSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada.
K ApplebaumDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
D L GaoZhong Shan Hospital Cancer Center, Shanghai 2000030, China.
D B ThomasDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS K01 OH009390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureAir PollutantsFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharidesLung NeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesAir PollutantsLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID25412237
PMCPMC4647246
OpenAlexW2025983332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.