Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411962›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Probing the effect of human normal sperm morphology rate on cycle outcomes and assisted reproductive methods selection.

Bo Li, Yefei Ma, Jianlei Huang, Xifeng Xiao, Li Li, Chuang Liu, Yongqian Shi, Dong Wang, Xiaohong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Re-evaluation of the value of sperm morphology in classicalThe Journal of international medical research · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Yefei MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Jianlei HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Xifeng XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Li LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Chuang LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Yongqian ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Xiaohong WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sperm morphology is the best predictor of fertilization potential, and the critical predictive information for supporting assisted reproductive methods selection. Given its important predictive value and the declining reality of semen quality in recent years, the threshold of normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR) is being constantly corrected and controversial, from the 4th edition (14%) to the 5th version (4%). We retrospectively analyzed 4756 cases of infertility patients treated with conventional-IVF(c-IVF) or ICSI, which were divided into three groups according to NSMR: ≥14%, 4%-14% and <4%. Here, we demonstrate that, with decrease in NSMR(≥14%, 4%-14%, <4%), in the c-IVF group, the rate of fertilization, normal fertilization, high-quality embryo, multi-pregnancy and birth weight of twins gradually decreased significantly (P<0.05), while the miscarriage rate was significantly increased (p<0.01) and implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, live birth rate, sex ratio, and birth weight(Singleton) showed no significant change. In the ICSI group, with decrease in NSMR (≥14%, 4%-14%, <4%), high-quality embryo rate, multi-pregnancy rate and birth weight of twins were gradually decreased significantly (p<0.05), while other parameters had no significant difference. Considering the clinical assisted methods selection, in the NFMR ≥14% group, normal fertilization rate of c-IVF was significantly higher than the ICSI group (P<0.05), in the 4%-14% group, birth weight (twins) of c-IVF were significantly higher than the ICSI group, in the <4% group, miscarriage of IVF was significantly higher than the ICSI group. Therefore, we conclude that NSMR is positively related to embryo reproductive potential, and when NSMR<4% (5th edition), ICSI should be considered first, while the NSMR≥4%, c-IVF assisted reproduction might be preferred.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, MaleMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25411962
PMCPMC4239063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.