ArticlePloS one2014
Probing the effect of human normal sperm morphology rate on cycle outcomes and assisted reproductive methods selection.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group.Andrology · 2026Guideline
- Targeted Amino Acids Profiling of Human Seminal Plasma from Teratozoospermia Patients Using LC-MS/MS.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a conventional in vitro total fertilization failure prediction model.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Looking with new eyes: advanced microscopy and artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Review
- Evaluation of selected semen parameters and biomarkers of male infertility - preliminary study.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Development a nomogram to predict fertilisation rate of infertile males with borderline semen by using semen parameters combined with AMH and INHB.Andrologia · 2021Article
- Genetic basis of acephalic spermatozoa syndrome, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in infertile men: a systematic scoping review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- High mRNA expression of GABA receptors in human sperm with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and teratozoospermia and its association with sperm parameters and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2021Article
- Fluorescence-Based Ratiometric Analysis of Sperm Centrioles (FRAC) Finds Patient Age and Sperm Morphology Are Associated With Centriole Quality.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Re-evaluation of the value of sperm morphology in classicalThe Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- Sperm Morphology: History, Challenges, and Impact on Natural and Assisted Fertility.Current urology reports · 2019Review
- A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?American journal of men's health · 2018Article
- Large nuclear vacuoles in spermatozoa negatively affect pregnancy rate in IVF cycles.Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2015Article
- Sperm morphology value in assisted reproduction: dismantling an enigma and key takeaways for the busy clinician.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthReview
- Comparative Evaluation of Two Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Devices: Laboratory Assessment of Sperm Quality and Retrospective Analysis of Embryological Outcomes Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- Modified strict sperm morphology threshold aids in the clinical selection of conventionalAsian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sperm morphology is the best predictor of fertilization potential, and the critical predictive information for supporting assisted reproductive methods selection. Given its important predictive value and the declining reality of semen quality in recent years, the threshold of normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR) is being constantly corrected and controversial, from the 4th edition (14%) to the 5th version (4%). We retrospectively analyzed 4756 cases of infertility patients treated with conventional-IVF(c-IVF) or ICSI, which were divided into three groups according to NSMR: ≥14%, 4%-14% and <4%. Here, we demonstrate that, with decrease in NSMR(≥14%, 4%-14%, <4%), in the c-IVF group, the rate of fertilization, normal fertilization, high-quality embryo, multi-pregnancy and birth weight of twins gradually decreased significantly (P<0.05), while the miscarriage rate was significantly increased (p<0.01) and implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate, live birth rate, sex ratio, and birth weight(Singleton) showed no significant change. In the ICSI group, with decrease in NSMR (≥14%, 4%-14%, <4%), high-quality embryo rate, multi-pregnancy rate and birth weight of twins were gradually decreased significantly (p<0.05), while other parameters had no significant difference. Considering the clinical assisted methods selection, in the NFMR ≥14% group, normal fertilization rate of c-IVF was significantly higher than the ICSI group (P<0.05), in the 4%-14% group, birth weight (twins) of c-IVF were significantly higher than the ICSI group, in the <4% group, miscarriage of IVF was significantly higher than the ICSI group. Therefore, we conclude that NSMR is positively related to embryo reproductive potential, and when NSMR<4% (5th edition), ICSI should be considered first, while the NSMR≥4%, c-IVF assisted reproduction might be preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.