Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411780›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2015

Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Ke Rong, Kai Yu, Xiaolong Han, Ignatius M Y Szeto, Xueying Qin, Junkuan Wang, Yibing Ning, Peiyu Wang, Defu Ma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ke Rong1Department of Orthopedics,Minhang Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai,People's Republic of China.
Kai Yu2Nestlé Research Center,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Xiaolong Han3China Astronaut Research and Training Center,Department of Space Food and Nutrition,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Ignatius M Y Szeto2Nestlé Research Center,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Xueying Qin4School of Public Health,Peking University Health Science Center,38 Xueyuan Road,Haidian District,Beijing 100191,People's Republic of China.
Junkuan Wang2Nestlé Research Center,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Yibing Ning2Nestlé Research Center,Beijing,People's Republic of China.
Peiyu Wang4School of Public Health,Peking University Health Science Center,38 Xueyuan Road,Haidian District,Beijing 100191,People's Republic of China.
Defu Ma4School of Public Health,Peking University Health Science Center,38 Xueyuan Road,Haidian District,Beijing 100191,People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR).

designMeta-analysis.

settingPubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles. SUBJECTS: Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR.

resultsSeventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexPostpartum PeriodPregnancyWeight GainDatabases, FactualDietFemaleHumansMotor ActivityObservational Studies as TopicUnited StatesBMIGestational weight gainPostpartum weight retention

Identifiers

PMID25411780
PMCPMC10271485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.