Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411773›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2015

Disparities in antidepressant use in pregnancy.

A Yamamoto, M C McCormick, H H Burris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physician Referrals During Prenatal Care.Maternal and child health journal · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Yamamoto1] Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, CA, USA [2] Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
M C McCormick1] Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA [2] Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
H H BurrisDepartment of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

The Toxic Environment and the Epigenetics of Fetal GrowthK23ES022242 · NIEHS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI BURRIS, HEATHER HERSON · 2013 to 2017
$790k
NIEHS NIH HHS K23 ES022242NIEHS NIH HHS K23-ES022242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Psychiatric Association both recommend pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression when the benefits outweigh the risks. While minority adults are less likely to use antidepressant medications compared with non-Hispanic Whites, whether this pattern occurs among pregnant women is unclear. We sought to determine the frequency of antidepressant medication use reported during ambulatory care visits for pregnant women and whether these rates varied by race. STUDY

designWe combined the 2006-2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to obtain nationally representative estimates of outpatient preventive care visits for pregnant women. We then obtained estimates of the prevalence of reported depression and antidepressant use during outpatient visits for pregnant women. To determine whether these estimates varied by race, we used multivariable logistic regression analyses accounting for survey design using SAS 9.2 (PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC) to estimate odds ratios of reported antidepressant use after adjustment for age, insurance status and region of the country.

resultAntidepressant use was reported during 2.2% of all outpatient visits for pregnant women. Providers indicated a depression diagnosis in 4.5% of visits. Among visits for depressed pregnant women, providers reported antidepressant use 25.4% of the time for all visits. Antidepressant use during pregnancy varied significantly by race/ethnicity. Among visits for non-Hispanic White women, 3.1% included a code for antidepressant use vs just 1.0% for non-White women (P<0.0001). After adjustment for age, insurance status and region of the country, this association persisted with non-Hispanic White (vs non-White) pregnant women having higher odds of antidepressant use (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% confidence intervals 2.1, 5.3).

conclusionNon-Hispanic White women were more likely than non-White women to be using antidepressants during pregnancy. Whether differences in antidepressant use by race/ethnicity indicates over-treatment of non-Hispanic White women or under-treatment of minorities remains unclear. This disparity warrants investigation with the goal of optimizing maternal mental health while minimizing potential adverse sequelae of antidepressants on developing fetuses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsChildDepressionEthnicityFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnant PeopleUnited StatesAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID25411773
PMCPMC4380708
OpenAlexW2015902867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.