ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015
Motor neuronal activity varies least among individuals when it matters most for behavior.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scaling of buccal mass growth and muscle activation determine the duration of feeding behaviours in the marine mollusc Aplysia californica.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Variational and phase response analysis for limit cycles with hard boundaries, with applications to neuromechanical control problems.Biological cybernetics · 2022Article
- Revealing the unique features of each individual's muscle activation signatures.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Control for multifunctionality: bioinspired control based on feeding in Aplysia californica.Biological cybernetics · 2020Article
- The neuromuscular transform in a single segment of a segmented heart tube.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Successful and unsuccessful attempts to swallow in a reducedLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Millisecond Spike Timing Codes for Motor Control.Trends in neurosciences · 2018Article
- Article
- Use of theJournal of neurophysiology · 2017Review
- Robustness, flexibility, and sensitivity in a multifunctional motor control model.Biological cybernetics · 2017Article
- Novel Methods to Enhance Precision and Reliability in Muscle Synergy Identification during Walking.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2016Article
- Sensory Feedback Reduces Individuality by Increasing Variability within Subjects.Current biology : CB · 2015Article
- Phylogenetic and individual variation in gastropod central pattern generators.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015Review
- Neuromechanical principles underlying movement modularity and their implications for rehabilitation.Neuron · 2015Review
- Rapid Adaptation to Changing Mechanical Load by Ordered Recruitment of Identified Motor Neurons.eNeuroArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
How does motor neuronal variability affect behavior? To explore this question, we quantified activity of multiple individual identified motor neurons mediating biting and swallowing in intact, behaving Aplysia californica by recording from the protractor muscle and the three nerves containing the majority of motor neurons controlling the feeding musculature. We measured multiple motor components: duration of the activity of identified motor neurons as well as their relative timing. At the same time, we measured behavioral efficacy: amplitude of grasping movement during biting and amplitude of net inward food movement during swallowing. We observed that the total duration of the behaviors varied: Within animals, biting duration shortened from the first to the second and third bites; between animals, biting and swallowing durations varied. To study other sources of variation, motor components were divided by behavior duration (i.e., normalized). Even after normalization, distributions of motor component durations could distinguish animals as unique individuals. However, the degree to which a motor component varied among individuals depended on the role of that motor component in a behavior. Motor neuronal activity that was essential for the expression of biting or swallowing was similar among animals, whereas motor neuronal activity that was not essential for that behavior varied more from individual to individual. These results suggest that motor neuronal activity that matters most for the expression of a particular behavior may vary least from individual to individual. Shaping individual variability to ensure behavioral efficacy may be a general principle for the operation of motor systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.