Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411458›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion.

Niels A Kloosterman, Thomas Meindertsma, Arjan Hillebrand, Bob W van Dijk, Victor A F Lamme, Tobias H Donner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels A KloostermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Brain and Cognition, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; niels.kloosterman@gmail.com.
Thomas MeindertsmaDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany;
Arjan HillebrandDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and Magnetoencephalography Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Bob W van DijkDepartment of Physics and Medical Technology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Faculty of Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Victor A F LammeDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Brain and Cognition, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Tobias H DonnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Center for Brain and Cognition, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conscious perception sometimes fluctuates strongly, even when the sensory input is constant. For example, in motion-induced blindness (MIB), a salient visual target surrounded by a moving pattern suddenly disappears from perception, only to reappear after some variable time. Whereas such changes of perception result from fluctuations of neural activity, mounting evidence suggests that the perceptual changes, in turn, may also cause modulations of activity in several brain areas, including visual cortex. In this study, we asked whether these latter modulations might affect the subsequent dynamics of perception. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure modulations in cortical population activity during MIB. We observed a transient, retinotopically widespread modulation of beta (12-30 Hz)-frequency power over visual cortex that was closely linked to the time of subjects' behavioral report of the target disappearance. This beta modulation was a top-down signal, decoupled from both the physical stimulus properties and the motor response but contingent on the behavioral relevance of the perceptual change. Critically, the modulation amplitude predicted the duration of the subsequent target disappearance. We propose that the transformation of the perceptual change into a report triggers a top-down mechanism that stabilizes the newly selected perceptual interpretation.

Indexed as

Optical IllusionsAdultBeta RhythmFemaleHumansMaleVisual Cortexbeta oscillationsbistable perceptionbrain dynamicsbrain stateperceptual decision-making

Identifiers

PMID25411458
PMCPMC4329440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.