Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411276›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2014

Cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Anne Whitehead, Eleanor J Beck, Susan Tosh, Thomas M S Wolever

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 359 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Effects of Oats (Frontiers in nutrition · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Dietary fibre for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne WhiteheadFrom the Medical & Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom (AW); the School of Medicine and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia (EJB); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Canada (ST); and the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (TMSW).
Eleanor J BeckFrom the Medical & Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom (AW); the School of Medicine and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia (EJB); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Canada (ST); and the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (TMSW).
Susan ToshFrom the Medical & Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom (AW); the School of Medicine and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia (EJB); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Canada (ST); and the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (TMSW).
Thomas M S WoleverFrom the Medical & Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom (AW); the School of Medicine and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia (EJB); Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Canada (ST); and the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (TMSW).
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute · AUAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth claims regarding the cholesterol-lowering effect of soluble fiber from oat products, approved by food standards agencies worldwide, are based on a diet containing ≥3 g/d of oat β-glucan (OBG). Given the number of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is important to update the findings of previous meta-analyses.

objectiveThe objective was to quantify the effect of ≥3 g OBG/d on serum cholesterol concentrations in humans and investigate potential effect modifiers.

designA meta-analysis was performed on 28 RCTs comparing ≥3 g OBG/d with an appropriate control. Systematic searches were undertaken in PubMed, AGRICOLA, and Scopus between 1 January 1966 and 6 June 2013, plus in-house study reports at CreaNutrition AG. Studies were assessed with regard to inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data were extracted from included studies by reviewers working independently in pairs, reconciling differences by consensus. Estimates of the mean reduction in serum cholesterol from baseline between the OBG and control diets were analyzed by using random-effects meta-analysis models and meta-regression.

resultsOBG in doses of ≥3 g/d reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol relative to control by 0.25 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.20, 0.30; P < 0.0001) and 0.30 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.24, 0.35; P < 0.0001), respectively, with some indication of heterogeneity (P = 0.13 and P = 0.067). There was no significant effect of OBG on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or triglycerides and no evidence that dose (range across trials: 3.0-12.4 g/d) or duration of treatment (range: 2-12 wk) influenced the results. LDL cholesterol lowering was significantly greater with higher baseline LDL cholesterol. There was a significantly greater effect for both LDL and total cholesterol in subjects with diabetes compared with those without (although based on few studies).

conclusionsAdding ≥3 g OBG/d to the diet reduces LDL and total cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/L and 0.30 mmol/L, respectively, without changing HDL cholesterol or triglycerides.

Indexed as

Avenabeta-GlucansCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDietary FiberHumansPlant ExtractsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriglyceridesbeta-glucan, (1-3)(1-4)-beta-GlucansCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLDietary FiberPlant ExtractsTriglyceridesHDL cholesterolLDL cholesterolmeta-analysisoatstotal cholesteroltriglycerideβ-glucan

Identifiers

PMID25411276
PMCPMC5394769
OpenAlexW2146961978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.