Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411190›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2015

Non-specific immunostaining by a rabbit antibody against gustducin α subunit in mouse brain.

Guoxiang Xiong, Kevin Redding, Bei Chen, Akiva S Cohen, Noam A Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. January in focus in HCB: antibody validation.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimized Protocol of Methanol Treatment for Immunofluorescent Staining in Fixed Brain Slices.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guoxiang XiongDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (GX, ASC)
Kevin ReddingMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (KR)
Bei ChenDepartments of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (BC, NAC)
Akiva S CohenDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (GX, ASC)
Noam A CohenDepartments of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (BC, NAC)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USMonell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

Injury-Induced Alterations in Limbic Functional CircuityR37HD059288 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI COHEN, AKIVA S · 2014 to 2023
$4.3M
Dietary reversal of cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injuryR01NS069629 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI COHEN, AKIVA S · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD059288NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gustducin is a guanosine nucleotide-binding protein functionally coupled with taste receptors and thus originally identified in taste cells of the tongue. Recently, bitter taste receptors and gustducin have been detected in the airways, digestive tracts and brain. The existing studies showing taste receptors and gustducin in the brain were carried out exclusively on frozen sections. In order to avoid the technical shortcomings associated with frozen sectioning, we performed immunofluorescence staining using vibratome-cut sections from mouse brains. Using a rabbit gustducin antibody, we could not detect neurons or astrocytes as reported previously. Rather, we found dense fibers in the nucleus accumbens and periventricular areas. We assumed these staining patterns to be specific after confirmation with conventional negative control staining. For the verification of this finding, we stained gustducin knockout mouse brain and tongue sections with the same rabbit gustducin antibody. Whereas negative staining was confirmed in the tongue, intensive fibers were constantly stained in the brain. Moreover, immunostaining with a goat gustducin antibody could not demonstrate the fibers in the brain tissue. The present study implies a cross immunoreaction that occurs with the rabbit gustducin antibody in mouse brain samples, suggesting that the conventional negative controls may not be sufficient when an immunostaining pattern is to be verified.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesBrainImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceNucleus AccumbensRabbitsTongueTransducinAntibodiesgustducinTransducinaxonal terminalimmunohistochemistrypeptide neutralizationpolyclonal antibodytaste bud

Identifiers

PMID25411190
PMCPMC4305516
OpenAlexW2003191154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.