Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25411088›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2015

Defining the phenotype of young healthy nucleus pulposus cells: recommendations of the Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 annual ORS meeting.

Makarand V Risbud, Zachary R Schoepflin, Fackson Mwale, Rita A Kandel, Sibylle Grad, James C Iatridis, Daisuke Sakai, Judith A Hoyland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Makarand V RisbudDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Graduate Program in Cell and Developmental Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Zachary R Schoepflin
Fackson Mwale
Rita A Kandel
Sibylle Grad
James C Iatridis
Daisuke Sakai
Judith A Hoyland

Funding

Role of HIF-1 in Intervertebral Disc FunctionR01AR055655 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RISBUD, MAKARAND V · 2008 to 2023
$6.1M
Model of Human Disc Regeneration in the spectrum of Degenerative Disc DiseaseR01AR057397 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IATRIDIS, JAMES C. · 2011 to 2021
$5.1M
Training in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineT32AR052273 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, IRVING M · 2006 to 2020
$3.3M
Regeneration of Nucleus Pulposus by Tissue EngineeringR01AR050087 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RISBUD, MAKARAND V, SHAPIRO, IRVING M · 2005 to 2013
$3.0M
Notochordal Cell Derived Therapies for Painful Disc DegenerationR01AR064157 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IATRIDIS, JAMES C. · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Disruption of Osmoregulation Promotes Degenerative Disc DiseaseR01AR064733 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RISBUD, MAKARAND V, SHAPIRO, IRVING M · 2014 to 2018
$2.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050087NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR050087NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055655NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR055655NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057397NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR057397NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064157NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR064157NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064733NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR064733NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR052273NIAMS NIH HHS T32AR052273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain is a major physical and socioeconomic problem. Degeneration of the intervertebral disc and especially that of nucleus pulposus (NP) has been linked to low back pain. In spite of much research focusing on the NP, consensus among the research community is lacking in defining the NP cell phenotype. A consensus agreement will allow easier distinguishing of NP cells from annulus fibrosus (AF) cells and endplate chondrocytes, a better gauge of therapeutic success, and a better guidance of tissue-engineering-based regenerative strategies that attempt to replace lost NP tissue. Most importantly, a clear definition will further the understanding of physiology and function of NP cells, ultimately driving development of novel cell-based therapeutic modalities. The Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 Annual ORS Meeting in New Orleans convened with the task of compiling a working definition of the NP cell phenotype with hope that a consensus statement will propel disc research forward into the future. Based on evaluation of recent studies describing characteristic NP markers and their physiologic relevance, we make the recommendation of the following healthy NP phenotypic markers: stabilized expression of HIF-1α, GLUT-1, aggrecan/collagen II ratio >20, Shh, Brachyury, KRT18/19, CA12, and CD24.

Indexed as

AggrecansAnimalsBiomarkersBrachyury ProteinCollagenFetal ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitIntervertebral DiscLow Back PainPhenotypeT-Box Domain ProteinsAggrecansBiomarkersBrachyury ProteinCollagenFetal ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitSHH protein, humanT-Box Domain Proteinscell phenotypeintervertebral discnucleus pulposus

Identifiers

PMID25411088
PMCPMC4399824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.